How to spatial calculate the Space Constant?
 immutable law (Netherland, ING Bank)
 squaring + the + circle +++ "intuitibe" ++ mathematics (USA Illinois Chicago)
Space consciouness is necessarily intuitive because alive moving capacity need to have a global view on space. This capacity is actually the human intuition capacity.
Concerning the squaring the circle resolution, it is rather a precise result of a defined problem. From there, successive reasons are deduced in series. The layout of the squaring a circle problem is as follows:
Considering an imutable structure of circle inscribed in a square, what can we do to define precisely the difference between these two figure aeras?
Because this problem resolution is starting from a precise defined issue it can be tell that the process of deduction is then a reasonning development towards a some answer. Even if in the underground we rest always on the mode of intuitive though, the analytical reasonning is a fertile complement for a global thinking. If only an intuitive mode is a guide for problem resolution, a theorem can't never be proved but always verified.
In fact, it is in this way that the squaring a circle can be resolved. There is a basic proof of the Squaring a circle that rests on how and why we can measure the difference between the aeras of the circlesquare in their common struture.
I did really a proof of the squaring a circle that is no more exposed in these texts. Origin of the squaring a circle is not due to some chance.
The fact that from year millenaries the squaring a circle is never resolved, proves that there is no hazard in the universe.
The hasard is then necessarily defined as:
1)  A creation of events from Nothingness.
3)  An abitrarily choice between a given set of already prefefined existing events. In this case, from where comes from this set of these events? Finally, this means that all the universe events are from Nothingness.
Because in this case theses laws are not universal. No reason asserts that our Universal Laws are made from Nothingness. If we note that universal Law means "happening in the whole Ubiquity and also Immutability or NoTime".
 i + need + to + make ++ a + "cicrcle" + graph + on + the + computer + how ? (USA)
 if + square + is + you + triangle + is + us + cirle + is + ok + what + is + zerologic (Japan)
 how + we + drive + value + of + pie (Pakistan)
 history of pi day (USA New York k12)
 history of pi (USA Georgia)
 how + to + make + a + teaching + device + in + the + value +of + pi (Philippines unep edu)
 pi de David Hilbert (Portugal)
 Squaring the circle (Indonesia)
 square the circle (UK)
 squaring the circle (Malaysia)
At first it is given there a third method to perform the squaring a circle.
This shows that the Dakhiometry Space Constant is really an immutable property of the universal circlesquare structure.
 discover square wheels.gif (Lithuania)
 geometry square inscribed (USA mia)
 squaring the circle (USA Hawai)
 square a circle (USA msn)
 square and circle (China)
 how + do + u + determin + the + aera + and + perimerter + of + a + "squar" (Canada)
 mathamatic bearings (Papua New Guinea)
 détermination + de + Pi (China)
 inventorofpi (USA Florida)
 formula + for + squaring + the + circle (USA Florida)
 "cricle" and a tangent (USA Indiana k12)
 final + fantasy + The + Cristall + Bears (Cuba)
 Where + is + the + beging + of + a + circle (Canada)
Where is the beginning of a permanence?
Because it receives so many emails for a such problem the circle decided to transmute into the reality a tool denoted as a Square for the universe measurement possibility. It began to do like as follows:
 space simultaneity (Virginmedia.net, UK)
This the basic consciousness of space property. Space is absolute. This is to tell that any point in space is immutably defined. This the simultanneity concept and it allows a fertile knowledge on matter space constructions..
 Squaring the circle (New York, Rochester Institute of Technology)
 c1 discontinuity (Japan)
 squaring + concrete + formula (USA Oregon)
Also, for any space scale, C1 represent the permanent relationship between a surface and its double. Particularly, C1 contains the define ratio between a circle surface to the square one circumscribed to it.
 Viet Nam geometry (Vietnam)
It consists here to produce a square (S) of aera equal to the circle (C).
After constructing and placing the little circle (C1) at the square center, two tangents of (C1) drawn from corner A and B of the square intersect themself at point (M).
Result
The point (M) is the middle of the square (S) side. (M) is the middle of side EF of square (S).
 formula for squaring a foundation (USA Oregon)
 tangent of circle finite analysis (USA)
In fact, the tangent of circle (C1) is only a way for memory. The segment AM can be defined by the intersection of (C2) and (C) at point (M). The aera of (C2) is twice the (C1) one. See further figure for the circle aera definition.
How to use the spatial structure of a circlesquare structure to spatial calculate the Space Constant of this following formula:
 proof + pi + raised + to + the + pi + rational (North Park University Chicago, USA)
 pi rational (magma.ca, ottawa, Canada)
 Korea + pi + rational (USA MSN vzw)
 Greek + mathematician + unresolved + value + of + Pi (Australia Victoria)
 greek + mathematician + calculator + of + unresolved + value + "if" + Pi (Australia Victoria)
SpaceCst= [(sqr(2.sqr(2)1)+(sqr(2)1)]^{2}
 "alebraic" images showing relationship (South of Florida, USA)
This is a proof of algebraic imprecision...
 proof: an introduction to higher mathematics (USA wv)
 eureka rational (UK Virgin Media)
 higher mathematics formula (Latvia)
 MATH formula (Korea)
 maths formula (Australia, Victoria)
 Gods mathematical formula (New Zealand, Wellington, Palmerston North, Auckland Massey University)
 mathematic formulas (Japan, Kyoto)
 Maths formulas (UK, Leicester De Montfort University)
 calculation math (University of KwaZuluNatal, South Africa)
This mode of calculation is done on the basic space element quantities. The Space Constnt calculation given here, is not a particular case of calculation. There is a method of determining any space dimension according to the four basic calculation operations as the addition, substraction, multiplication and the division. Obviously any algebraic calculation can be preformed by this spatial method. It represents the precise and exactness of quantity reality while the algebraic language convention tools are full of irrationallity unknown holes.
This next figurepart(a) show how construction of the spaceconstant give the value 3.12...
This value was determined as given by the above formula.
Now as a reciprocal calculation way, how can we do to construct this formula with space elements?
For this purpose, we start on the structure given at this figurepart(b).
Note that modern computer can use CAD program that can culculate figure lengths. This way of calculating lengths rests on the internal program convention of a unit length for internal calculations. One can drawn from there any length equal to 1.
 45 + degrees + circular + area (Cyprus)
You are right.
The quarter of a circle aera of S=k.D^{2} is equal to the aera of the circle of diameter (D/2). This latter aera is equal to the "Pi" value relatively to the scale of its spatial figure.
There are more many wealthy interesting relationships given by the Spatial Constant denoted here as (T_{T}), when one use the Spatial Language. Particularly, on aeras delimited by an arc and segments, as for examples, the ones on this next figures.
 circles with area pi
(Japan narutou)
All these cyan colored circles are of space constant aeras.
The Space Constant can be get from a circle of diameter 2. It can be written as:
T_{T} = k.2^{2};
or :
k = T_{T}/4 = 0,78004843...
Therefore, what we tell from the squaring a circle is only a value proportional to a basic real constant denoted here by (k).
Therefore, the above figurepart(b) can be choose as a basic structure for calculationg lengths of figures.
On this basis it is shown in the following how to construct the above formula.
However, because the current arithmetics standard is wellknown, the numerical value must be considered only as verification of qpace construction. Because the space construction gives necessarrily a Rationnal exact and precise lenght. That is to say spatial calculation never give irrationnal number.
Important
The Dakhiometry can do complete calculationsbyconstruction for any scale of figure. The scale defined here is only for everybody more easy understading.
 pi drawn around a circle
Actually.
There is a unique certainty about a length. It is the length of the Space Constant. We are certain that this Constant length is both the staight line and the curvilinear one! Wealthy consequences can be deduced from this base.
 RIGHT + ANGLE ++++ SIDE + AND + DIAGONAL + SQUARING + THE + circle (USA)
 square inscribed in a circle, find the area of the circle (USA California)
It is easy to see that the square where a circle is inscribed has an aera two time the one of the square inscribed in this circle.
To calculate the aera of a circle as function of its inscribed square, we will use what these two figures have as common length. It is the diameter D of the circle that is at the same time the diagonal of its inscribed square.
So, the aera S of the inscribed square is equal to the half of the one of the square where this corresponding circle is inscribed. We write as:
S = D^{2}/2 or 2S = D^{2}
We know that the circle aera C is:
C = (Pi/4). D^{2}
Therefore it can be stated:
Theorem of the circle aera C as a function of the inscribed square one S.
C = (Pi/2).S
 rational + pi (bosch.de, Germany)
 pi + is + rational (USA Florida Tamu edu)
 pi+is+rational (UK)
 "mathamatic" + pi (Germany)
 is + pi + rational (USA Kansas)
 pi + is + known + to + be + rational (USA)
 pi + is + rational (USA)
 What + does + is + mean + to + square + a + circle (USA)
 pi history and the formula of pi (New Zealand)
 a circle that demonstrates where the actual measurement is derived for pi (USA Georgia)
 scientists + give + each + other + "hight" + pi (USA Virginia)
 did + proving + that + a + circle + can + be + squared + have + something + to + do + with + pi (USA Illinois k12)
I had exposed this problem all along my texts in this website here. It was exposed all the aspects and consequences of the squaring a circle. There was not only the quite particular aspect that an Old Pi is now seeing as a simple trick to approximate a factor denoted as Pi, to measure the circle circumference. Particularly, there is no ideologic discourse in may texts. And if there are ideologies, they are from the current world the ideology of them is to protect their stake and not according to human reason of science.
If there are someones that tempt to preserve the old erroneous Pi as constant for Mathematic caculations, it is no more concerning my responsibility.
The rational signification of the squaring a circle is the CERTAINTY of getting the Space Constant. This latter is the absolute knowledge key allowing the precise measurements of the universe space. The problem of squaring a circle is not a game and riddle for mathematicians entertainement. Because resolving the square transformation from a circle is not only for a quite exact and precise particular and specific old issue. This latter was done approximatly for a circle circumference as a function of its diameter according to the Old Pi. The Space Constant is a more general wealthy reason conquest to get into the forms of space that human necessarry need for their technology.
Thus the squaring a circle is a general useful and indispensable key for a human advanced knowledge. Because of it general quality, the Space Constant is also the solution for the usual particular problem concerning the circle the property of that was NEVER really known. For example, amongst many possibilities, the Space Constant allows to know what is precisely the circumference and the aera of an ellipse while an old Pi can't give any idea on this issue.
The response to this question is:
The solution of squaring a circle, is the one to resolve precisely and exactly the circle circumference. It allows to get the Space Constant, the absolute solution that an old Pi can never assert.
 how + many + points + of + pi + are + in + the + circonference + of + the + universe (USA Georgia k12)
This is a fascinating conjecture.
May be one of your searcher or any other one on Earth will have some answer one day. In this time, the universe space will open to human. trips.
 inventer + of + pi + 3.12 (USA)
This day on March 2008 is now really the "Pi Day". Because it is the First Time that someone tells practicaly the numeral 3.12. Good! It remains for the billion of little calculators on Earth to tell simply the same truth. What a world more infinite than the universe!
 set + induction + for + circlemathematics (Malaysia)
 great world "matematic"
 pie (matematics) (USA Viginia k12)
 PI + in + "matematics" (Kyrgyzstan)
 real + value + of + pi (USA Wisconsin)
 mathematic (Poland)
  why + do + so + many + modern + round + objects + not + equal + pi + when + the + circumference + is + divided + by + the + diameter
 mathamatical instruments (Sri Lanka)
 "MATEMATICS" limit (Turkey)
 End + segment + method + of + computation + of + pi (USA)
 higher mathematics (USA Miami)
Calculation layout
 proove + Pie + is + 3.14 (South Arabia)
Actually, here in the following, is the proof by spatial calculation, how Pie is equal idirectly to 3.14.
 purebasic + pi + calculation (Thailand)
 what the impossibility theorem really is (USA New Jersey)
 what + us + value + of + pi (USA Texas)
 Geometric Solutions of Algebraic Equations (Korea)
 greek + scientist + considered + to + be + the + greatest + mathematician + of + the + ancient + world + who + calculated + the + the + unresolved + value + of + Pi (Australia)
It was Archimedes. But how he did exactly these calculations is really unknown.
 value + of + pi (USA, Colorado, Boulder University of Colorado)
 formula pi (Portugal)
 pi compas (Mexico)
 pi + value (Ukraine)
 calculus gif animation (Lebanon)
 Algebra off course (Peru, Carvajal Co hace las cosas bien)
... of course, really. It can be constructed (calculated) any length of the space structures more than Algebraic methods can do and imagine. It is to say the one real human knowledge should be to get back and to regain his basic capacity of linking to rational space, the reality needed for the life development.
 pi geometry (Croatia)
 Pi + 3.12 + Indiana (USA, Ohio Cleveland CaseWesternReserv Univ., student cwru edu)
 how + accurate + is + Archimedes + value + of + pie + compared + to + the + values + known + then + to + the + values + know + now (optusnet, Victoria, Australia)
Fist pioneers!
 pi + accurate (Vietnam, Viettel)
 Mathamatics + new + invention (operamini.net)
 Greek + scientist + unresolved + value + of + pi (iprimus.net.au, Melbourne, Australia)
 new pi formulas never used before (charter.com, Alabama, USA).
....... while our current running date is 2011.
Let us construct the corresponding value of this equality:
Here denoted as:
SpaceCst= [(sqr(2.sqr(2)1)+(sqr(2)1)]^{2}
Spatial calculus of this equality is done progressiveley as follow:
R1 = (2.sqr(2)1)
R2 = sqr(R1)
R3 = (sqr(2)1)
R4 = R2+R3
Finally
SpaceConstant = [R4]^{2}
 how + the + children + reads + writes + and + understanding + in + class + at + biginning (airtelbroadband.in, India)
 MATHAMATICS LANGUAGE (Singapore)
All of existing languages are language for reporting realities. Thus, human language is only memories of realities. It is only formed with realities consequences. However, these latter are not always fully accessed. Human language are thus necessarry the product of anthropomorphic realities. Human languages are then consequences of imperfect reality notions. Therefore, no language can be creator of reality.
In the other side if human has the property of knowledge on himself and on what are realities surrounded him, this means that there is a direct link between oneself with what is not oneself. There is a direct link between oneself with the whole reality. This link is denoted as the unique universal language, the one of reality consciousness. For example, measuring precisely something is a direct link for accessing to a reality. Reality is no more than the World presence.
we can tell that this direct consciousness of reality is the Mathematics Language. However, the true mathematics language is only concerned on direct reality consciousness and not what is usually known as mathematics formalisms. The true Language is the consciousness of the fact of space matter structure. Reality is founded on these universal structures from where changes of reality forms are constructed. It is why knowledge on this direct universal reality language allows the understanding of natural phenomena and also allows the possibilities of human action for reality constructions.
 circle achitecture (Korea)
Actually, space is architectured and architecture is space.
 matter + universe + is + constant (Canada)
It is why any form transformation is perfectly and precisely defined by law of logics.
 PI ACCURATE VALUE (quinetic.com, QuinetiQ, Inspired solutions for a changing world, UK)
 most + accurate + value + of + pie (Singapore)
 natural + formula (China)
 pie proof math (Thailand)
 rational + form + of + pi (USA Berkeley edu)
 calculationg true lengths (UK Grimsby)
 "mathamatic" + signs (Canada)
 square root (Greece)
 geometry plane line intersection (Romania)
 one circular object with progressive rhythm (India)
 instruments matemátics compas (Spain)
 spider circle square (USA)
 how + to + proof + equation + circle (Qatar)
 define full circle (USA Arizona)
 mathematics and circle pi (Georgia)
 The + ultimate + value + of + PI (Ireland)
 PI + accurate (South Africa, University of Cape Town, Wamkelekile Iunivesithi Yasekapa)
Let us construct at first
R1 = (2.sqr(2)1)
According to the above reference figurepart(b), we get a circle of radius equal to R1.
 step by step procedure to approximate value of pi using only a perfectly straight stick (okstate.edu, Oklahoma, USA)
 how to determine space needs (USA amerHonda)
 square root of line (east.verizon.net, New York, USA)
 big circle dia measure (Korea)
 not wear a mask (Indonesia, www.motorcycleusa.com/)
In second, il will be determined the square root of
R1 = (2.sqr(2)1)
That is how to determine R2=sqr(R1).
A circle of diameter AB=R1 is drawn. This latter intersects the unit line at point (H). We get then:
Segment AH = R2 = sqr(R1)
Next it will be to construct the length
R3 = (sqr(2)1)
 how to construct a prayer wheel (herts.ac.uk, Hertfordshire University, UK)
 how to construct a wheel giant (telepac.pt, Portugal)
... for a great funfair?
 construct a Tibetan prayer wheel (Singapore)
Many more prayer wheels for a better world.
 Srilankan students Hertfordshire University
 Hertfordshire university (China, http://gjxy.yangtzeu.edu.cn)
 Tibetan cosmology (Brazil)
 Tibetan prayer wheels (lv.cox.net, USA)
This is to construct length (sqr(2)) subs length=1.
This is given directly in the above referent figure. We represent R3 as the radius of a circle as is shown on this next figure.
We can now construct the following result as:
R4 = R2+R3
This construction is straight direct. Thus, R4 is obtained.
The construction of (R)^{2} is given in the next following shematic.
 can be calculated by using the following formula (Russian Federation)
Any quantity of the space can be PRECISELY détermined by construction.
The numeric system was only a conventional subtitute for defining a quantity when spatial construction is ignnored. Quantity is necessary the total discrete Points of Lines and Curves. Note that a given spatial construction is universally determined when defining any given Figure unit. It can be perform all the usual types of operations used un algebraic and arithmetic numeric methods.
 Practically proof of value of pi with figure (operamini.net, Nepal)
 excat + value + of + pi (Nepal)
Here is how to get the (R4)^{2}
 gif construct a circle and show how to find pi (k12.or.us, Oregon, USA)
Pi Length = AP = (R_{4})^{2}
 The + Law + of + Conservation + of + Matter + animation (Virginia Institute of Marine Science, USA)
Actually. Space is a matter. No need to any approximation method, the Squaring a circle is possible as concept and as transformation only according to the precise matter law of conservation.
 a pi + squared + proof (Canada)
 easy pi explanation and calculation (iinet.net.au, Australia)
 product structure calculation how solve (Singapore, www.fpml.org/)
 the + accurate + value + of + pi (Singapore)
 most + accurate + compass + and + easyest + to + use (mrtc.com, Moutain Telephon, Kentucky, USA)
 enters an accurate value of pi (Phenix, USA)
The only absolute precise value of Pi is only given by a length. For example, on this figure Pi is the segment AP. It happens when an unity length is defined for this figure drawing. Or if there is no particular defined unity then, the length (AP) can be taken as the constant unit of this drawing. This a great practical advantage of spatial construction method. It is why the Dakhiometry denote this Length as a Spatial Constant et not only some the usual means for circle diameter measurement.
Numérical value given by any calculator, suffer errors due to numerical conventions on defining quantity as Number with language alphabets.
Only spatial construction can define precisely any length. There is really spatial constructions that can do any complex calculations according to the four basic operations to define any absolute precise quantity. It is done in their continuity of quantities without a lack in this latter.
 formulas + de + pi (Columbia)
Finally, how to do R4 squared?
For this purpose, the circle of radius=R4 intersects the vertical unit line at point (T).
Now it can be drawn a circle of diameter AP that also has a chord AT.
Final result:
AP is the result of spatial calculation for the formula:
AP= SpaceCst= [(sqr(2.sqr(2)1)+(sqr(2)1)]^{2}
Note:
The Space Constant is concerning all the universe space, WHEN A GIVEN UNIT IS CHOOSEN
For example when the Space Constant Length by itself is chosen as this Unit.
fundamental of Science Accuracy:
LAW OF THE UNIVERSE ABSOLUTE SPACE
In spatial Language,
whatever is the choosen UNITLength:
THE LENGTH OF THE SPACECONSTANT IS DIRECTLY DEDUCED FROM THIS CHOOSEN UNIT LENGTH AND ALSO FROM THE SQUARE ROOT OF [2 time the UnitLength] !!!
The space structure of this above next figure and also the PiFormula prove directly this
LAW OF THE UNIVERSE ABSOLUTE SPACE.
Suggestion for scientific definitions of Basic Measurement Quantities:
The Absolute Space is a basic factor for a best understanding on the universe transformation phenomena.
Until now the Metric system was invented for science accessing to phenomena. However the Metric system is only a relative conventional one for human use only. There are many types of reference for measurements in the world.
Now, it is an advantage to rest on a true unique universal reference of quantity measurement.
Therefore, it is more general to define a universal unit of length getting directly from universe principle according to the Absolute Space where a rational Universal SpaceConstant of length is precisely defined.
The so mystic Pi of 3.14116... on that man was suffering so much difficulties:
a)  At first, it is as a Ghost indefined quantity.
b)  And then, Pi is only some mystic irrational Number from also an artificial Magic Number denoted as universe Archetypal, the one from an undefined Nothingness of the universe.
c)  Finally, this Pi was mathematically sa colled proved as the FACT of Impossibility Part of the Univers...
Now, the Universe Space is proved as being Absolute.
Thus, true human Science should rest on true rational defined of accurate unit of Length.
Drawing a geometric figure need at first to define a unit Length.
The figure unit needs only to choose anygivenLength.
A universal measurement reference is a great benefit for modern antiwasting industry activities on Earth.
Modern science should work for defining a new Universal Measurement of Forms in the Rational Absolute Space of the Universe. The new discovery of the Length SpaceConstant, should be the Root for establishing a such New True and Real universal practical system. Why does TheSPACEConstant can't be the the Universal Unit of length???
This is for Man the main necessity.
The fortune is smiling on human. The wealthy construction is the property of the universe. E.T. peoples is surely a facts in the universe space. The probabiity of an alive planet like the Earth is low. More, the discovery of the Absolute property in somewhere of the Space for an E.T. finding a physical SpaceConstant may be very rare.
Therefore, when Man was really hitting by the stroke of luck in finding the Absolute property of the Universe Whole Space. The Universe will be assuredly the place for New Man's EarthSciences with the new potential capability for his space exploration. The vast whole Universe Space during the next Futur will be his interested field.
May be, we have to expect:
Man get there a new chance and a new key on the universe knowledge.
This is the sign of Man fortune, to be a futur
I.T. for somebody, elsewhere far from the Earth and somewhere in the Universe vast Space!!!
Example when the [Unit of Figures is defined by
The SpaceConstant as the FigureUnit]
Here next, is concerning a DakhiometryConjecture Concerning the universe Absolute Space:
What is the meaning of the SpaceConstant?
(From Length = Number (1)
into [SpaceConstant Length = as Unit].
The result is that we get:
A figure of Cercle Unit with :
Diameter = Unit
And a Cercle Unit with aera = 0.25
It can be seen that the current Man's traditional Mysticism of Circle is vanishing for ever.
For the Straight Length,
the Metric may be also progressively changed into the universal SpaceConstant Unit.
But there,
man will meat his Traditinal Inertia contradiction...
Do you have some understanding about the Absolute Space, after somme millenaries living under Nothingness and Relativity believes???
Conjecture:
From millenary, Mathematics was searching the Pi value particularly the PiLength.
However, what is this socalled Mathematics Length of Pi.
And now,
What is the meaning of the Absolute Space represented precisely by the SpaceConstant???
The fundamental Space Constant length is strictly rational
 square root of 2 is rational proof Philippine university (USA)
 Tangen Politechnic Norway (Poland)
 most + accurate + value + of + pi + ever + generated (Philippines)
 equivalent diameter circle to square (comcast.net, Virginia, USA)
 prove + point + p + to + line + l + is + unique (sbcglobal.net, California, USA)
 how + will + you + use + the + circle + to + prove + the + value + of + pie (India)
The Space Constant Length is a Rational quantity.
A)  Because its length is constructible.
B)  Because it proves that the circle and the square perimeter are exactly equal. This is proved in the following of:
The squaring a circle according to equality criterion
This next figure shows how to square a circle with the criterion that their perimeters are equal.
This construction is possible only as downstream consequence of the squaring a circle with equality aeras criterion.
This can be done according to the following logic:
a)  We know how to construc the initial squaring a circle of diameter (D = MN) using the little circle (C1).
From there it is deduced the Length:
AB = Pi
In such structure, this gives the formula of any circle perimeter as:
Perim_{circle} = Pi.MN
From this base, it can be induced that in any of this structure, a square (ABCD) perimeter is:
Perim_{square} = AB.4
Then,
Perim_{circle} = Perim_{square}
Or
Pi.MN = AB.4
Finally, when the old Pi is renamed as SpaceConstant then,
The Space Constant, is given universally in any of this circle/square structure, by:
Pi = (AB.4)/MN
This logically means that in this structure, the square perimeter (ABCD) is always equal to the circle one, as 4 times the symbolic Pi length (AB) of any figure scale.
Such equality comes from the reason that the quantity (4), is no more than the SCALING FACTOR for the Pi, in any figure scale.
It is why
in Dakhiometry the old name Pi, is more Justly denoted as the Space Constant provided that it value is always valid in any space scale.
Fantastic isn't?!!!
Result
Theorem of the squaring a circle on the criterion of perimeter equality:
According to figures by spatial construction, with perimeter equality criterion, the squaring of any circle of diameter MN, whatever is its dimension scale, the perimeter of the resulting square is always equal to 4 times the Length AB.
This next figure resumes the squaring a circle of diameter MN with:
1)  In red color, the square under aeras equality criterion.
2)  The square ABCD is the result of squaring the circle, under perimeters equality criterion.
Consequently, this means that:
The Space Constant Length AB is a RATIONAL QUANTITY.
In summary
The universe Absolute Space is characterized to have the two properties of being Curvilinear and Linear.
The Absolute Space is then defined by ONE Constants in the two forms concerning the Quadratic and the Linear ones. They are given through the Circle to the Square Transformations.
The unique Space Constant construction is given in its two forms on the above figure and next under two numeral form representations:
Under such spatial forms, the direct and the reciprocal of circle versus square, can be get easily when is given AB or MN.
Written under the old rigid Number form is:
 the + numberto + of +pi (sbcglobal.net, California, USA)
 did Archimedes use area or circumference to calculate pi (UK)
It is to don'tforgetme.
In anciant time Euclide try to see the factor that link between a circle and a line. This comes from the fact that a running wheel performs a rotation cycle with its diameter. It is the same problem that Archimedes temps to resolve. It is to resolve the circle circumference with equivalent polygons.
Thus the classical Squaring a Circle is concerned only to know the circle diameter as a factor given by a circumference Length. Extended to the aeras equality is due only to that it was supposed that the diameter of a circle is probably concerned as a common factor.
But really, Aeras or Circumferences are not clearly defined as a "to be or not to be" way for resolving the squaring a circle.
Thus logically, it should be stated that:
When one had done the squaring a circle, one should underline this common factor as both the Aeras and the Lines as this equalities or this unity in the circlesquare equivalence.
Consequently, this unity has the main meaning of the Universal Transformation Constancy, the property of that defines the concretness of the Absolute Space.
 how + do + you + know + that + squaring + is + a + reversible + operations (comcast.net, USA)
 The + mathematical + nature + of + PAI + forbids + the + construction + of + a + straight + section + with + a + length + equal + to + the + perimeter + of + a + circle + using + only + ruler + and + compass. + as + well + as + the + squaring + of + the + circle (sbcglobal.netn USA)
May be, "PAI" is the problem key.
Because as shown in the following, it can be easily constructed the length of the square (K2) perimeter equal precisely to the circle (Cs) one.
 equivalent diameter circle to square (comcast.net, Virginia, USA)
 the application example of regions between circle and square (uta.edu, USA)
Actually, comparing circle to square and consequently to any other form, is equivalent to compare precisely, square to square or circle to circle.
More,
this can be done universally whatever are concerned any scale in space.
 animasi + mathematic + chapter + circle (Malaysia)
 walking along a circle with rational step (missouri.edu, USA)
 Discretness + of + a + scientific + text (Ukraine)
 equivalent square for circle (Madison, Wisconsin, USA)
It is really what is the rationnal fulness in EQUIVALENCE as relationships meaning. The euclidean Equality by Superposition is only a particular empirical statement.
 mathematical impossibilities (Australia)
 a circle is inscribed in a square. Remove the corners and the perimeter stays the same (USA)
... the perimeter of this cercle and this square with its new aera.
Actually, it is because this new square is in fact, the result of this circle squaring. Really, the squaring a circle has the simultaneity property for the universe Beginning event where process of construction was starting at a whole. It is the characteristic of the whole universe Absolute Space. This explain the pertinency of the Dakhion ubiquity as a physical property.
 Determination + of + the + value + of + pi + theory (Ghana)
 which + mathematician + founded + a + society + whose + logo + is + a + "sqared + sqare" (India)
Actually.
It can be noted that the squaring a square is neither forbidden nor impossible. One can do easily the squaring a square, with a circle as a relational medium.
 ETBU + immutability (USA)
 universal + factor ++ mathematics (Niger)
It is the TRUE Space Constant. Consequence is that Locations anywhere in tbe universe space structure, are perfectly and immutably determined in their forms. It is why any form and quantities, near by or far aways from an observer, is always in its same form and quantities. The perspective view is only an illusion factor in three dimension that is only significant as 3D scales.
 Principles + of + Consequences (Austin, USA)
 New Pi Theory (Croatia (Hrvatska))
 circle + internal + square (Ireland)
Actually. Pregnant Circle.
 THE + CIRCLE + AND + PI + AS + SYMBOL + OF + INFINITE + LIVING + MIND (mtn.co.za, South Africa)
 elements + of + construction + law + in + Malaysia (Malaysia)
 squaring of the circle problem proof (comcast.net, Pennsylvania, USA)
 space + structure (Vietnam)
 equivalent circle AND square (videotron.ca, Canada)
 Transmutation circle (Ukraine)
 using angle properties in Circle art (Manitoba, Canada)
 transcendentaal pi (Netherland)
 equivalent + square + from + circle (rogers.com, Canada)
This is a just expression on this problem. It is because equivalence concerns any physical factors that can define objects.
But when was tell as the Squaring a Circle, one shows that this problem concerns to adjust different Forms, like what a blacksmith was working on iron material. Mathematics are mainly as mechanical manipulations. It was this method that Archimedes had used in tempting tp resolve his Pi and his Method. They are only mechanical manipulations. It is because
the Geometry was and is to day, the erroneous idea resting on MORPHING things.
The Absolute Space is multiple in its differents in its uniqueness and multiple of structures. But Space is not contradictory with the possibility of Morphing Space as it is basically stated by the Relativities theories. Therefore, the Reltivities stay in the inheritance of the old millenary belief of the Geometry Morphing method.
 pi is rational (tamu.deu, Texas, USA)
 Which is an accurate description of pie (bellsouth.net, USA)
 Intrinsic circles (verizon.net, Buffalo, USA)
Really, the circle is intrinsic to any linear figure. The circle is trully the root origin of Forms in the universe. Forms in the universe is as the Tree, where the root is the Cricle Circle properties. It is why the Space is both Isotropic and Homogeneous. At the origin, the Space is in Permanent state. At this time tne universe is circular and the spase is only Isotropic. When appeared the Linear property in space, this latter get the property on being in the capacity of matter in mutual interaction. The universe Beginning can then started according to the event of the Squaring the Circle process for the fulness of Isotropic and Homogeneous Space properties.
 fullmetal alchemist transformation circle (USA)
 taoist + squaring + the + circle (k12, Ohio, USA)
 Constructing + The + Universe (Vietnam)
 demonstration of squaring the circle (Bolivia)
 squaring + a + circle + is + possible (Brazil)
 value of pi IN UNIVERSE (youbroadband.in, India)
Actually. This value is a Universal Constant as due to the construction by transformation property inscribed in the Circle structure. This universal property drives to great consequences. For example without this Constant, science will never kow matter Aeras and Volumes than only acoording to the empirical methods. Also, the existence if a such universal Constant, shows that the Relativity theories are quite born from a huge fantasy.
 geometrische + konstruktion + von + harmonischem + mittel (Germany)
 new pi circle (houstonisd.org, Texas, USA)
 all + truth + can + be + circumscribed + into + one + great + whole (insightbb.com, InsightBroadband)
We can actually determine all the principles from there are originated all the Truth as a Whole that we human can access. All the truth from there are formed our rational knowledge.
 new + pi + value (blackberry.net, BlackBerry, USA)
Next figure resumes a more deeper inside view of the Squaring a Circle properties.
In fact, there are really a double equivalent results given by the squaring problem solutions. The Key (AB) of this problem gives rise to two solutions of transmuting a Circle into a square in both Forms of equalities as follows:
1)  Transformation under Equality of Aeras.
2)  Transformation under Equality of Perimeters.
It show that the ratios between the three Circles and the three Squares circumscibed to theses circles are equal to the same Space Constancy divided by 4.
The consequence are also to give the different angles characteristic to these transmutations. These angles are the right angle of a square. Therefore, we can tell that the squaring a Circle gives wholy the 3 characteristics of a square as:
A)  A Length.
B)  An Aera.
C)  And a RightAngle.
Fantastic isn't?
In fact, the Circle produces a turnkeySquare or a readymade Square for the Beginning of the universe construction.
Note
A such universal Constancy in the universe space misrepresents the Einstein's Relativity where his massspatiotime can be deformed at any time and where the Space can have no determined form.
 DETERMINATION + OF + RATIONAL + VALUES (Russian Federation)
 pi RATIONAL NUMBER (Poland)
This above equality is spatially constructible.
 precision measurement through the verification of pi (pldt.net, Philippines)
 true + value + of + pi (hispeed.ch, Switzerland)
 how + accurate + is + pi (amedd.army.mil, USA)
 how + are + the + digits + of + pi + calculated + and + when + calculation + how + do + they + calculate + it (saix.net, South Africa)
The denoted quantity problem is not resolved until now by any existing science.
Because until now quantity is only a language word know as conventional Number. A word Number is significant for limited particular quantities only by convention. Quantities obey to the universe principle of discrete Succession continuity. Thus whatever are word that language can invented, they are only imperfect image of the succession. For example the decimal Number can't represent the true successive quantity of matter. The Number words as base to represent quantities are necessarily a distorsion of the true quantities. Mathematics had invented the Irrationallity and the Real Numbers. These methods are only mirages of quantities continuity. Now the modern digital technology is only the direct application of thes Numbers mirages. As for the Achimedes' exhaustion principle, any digital calculation, as wide as their digital words length are, is necessarily like the Achiles running after the Tortoise.
The current Sciences don't know how to dénote any precise quantity because of their belief on the Number illusions.
Only precise quantities can be in concret terms represented by space elements as point and lines. This should be a futur issue that science have to resolved. In the meantime, any quantity represented by the language words as Numbers, is only approximation that can't goes further than a maximum of 4 or 5 decimals. Practically quantitiy precision remains the same known and established by Euclide that are no more than some percents. For example, the formalism of [
1^{35} ] is only a mirage even if modern sciences rest on such convention. Error done with such formalism during long algebraic calculations where the Euclidean division algorithm is an another systematic source to complete for a total blurring of precision possibility.
So the so called infnite irrational value for the Archimede Pi is not a scientific problem. It is no more than a scientist pleasant applied mathematic joke like the Zeno's Aciles and the Tortoise. Really, there are too much basic things that the current sciences have to build to be abble to cancel too much of their millenary illusions.
 new + value + for + pi (ed.ac.uk, The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK)
 true + "balue" + of + pi + not + 3.1415 (suddenlink.net, USA)
 line + circle + purebasic + intersection (Germany)
 pi + length (Hungary)
 the + square + root + of + pi (USA s.o. California)
On this above figure, AT is the square root of Pi.
 pi + rational (Germany Bosch)
 Physic + Scientiest + and + Mathematician + Formula (Malaysia)
Current science is looking the world through Relativity Optic
 how + many + centimeters + squared + equals + a + meter + squared (direcpc.com, USA)
Proceeding in such manner we get always:
(x centimeters)^{n} = 1
That is to tell, human is always living in Relativity realm. He can know the world only by relativity in measurement. It is why human science needs so many unit systems for measurement.
Therefore, science can define something only in one choosen unit sytem. Thus, we can not measure something through two different units as centimeter together with meter. What we can do is to mesure things only with meter or only in centimeter. For example the good manner is:
(0.0x meter)^{2} = (y meter)^{2}
It is the possible definition Relatively to the Meter as Unit.
Would our destiney be only in relativity manner?
The answer is no!
There is the unique good manner for science of measurement. It is the use of elements of spacial realm for science.
Because we can always measure or calculate a length (A) as the square of an another length (B) squared. The result is always unique in spatial language.
For we human, to read such results we need only to introduce in this system, a given length defined as the Unit of these measurements.
Finally, the only thing to do is to scale any length according to this given unit!
Note
All these calculations rest on logics justified by perfect reasons that are not exposed here but can be verified by everyone everywhere in the world.
 religion pure geometry distribution (Australia, Melbourne RMIT University)
 advance calculation (versatel.nl, Netherlands)
Because there is really a complete process of spatial method for calculations with the four basic operations. For example, any point of rectangular aera can be precisely deternined by spatial calculation of multiplication or division this include root of quantities. This way of calculation is until now ignored because human was from millenary formated to the Arithmetics and Algebraic manner of seeing the world.
 miracle geometry
If this remark concerns the spatial calculation then it is really a most astonishing event for the usual one's habit of calculations. But considering that calculations are no other think than the space as absolute property. Absolute state means that everything can be defined and therefore, known from any where of space location. Precise calculations is the consequences of such space property. Manipulating space element don't know any hole necause space is the fullness of the universe.
 pi + value (Romania Craiova)
 circle squared geometry (mysmart.ie, Ireland)
This next figure resumes all the above spatial constructions. It is here no more any resolution of old Pi using the impotent Geometry.
 geometry in circle square (mlngroup.net, MLL Micro Leads Limited, Bangladesh)
 how + to + make + the + easyest + cake + on + earth + without + wipped + cream (acanac.net, ACANAC INC Feature Panel, Canada)
 squaring method for building (tstt.net.tt, Trinidad And Tobago)
 Acanac logo (acanac.net, Acanc Inc., Canada)
 background + of + the + pi + value (Kampuchea, Cambodia)
 National Academy for the Performing ArtsTrinidad&Tobago (Israel)
 method of gold secant (ukrtel.net, Ukraine)
 achitecture in Cambodia (Cambodia)
Nice Khmer architecture art...
 Achitecture in Cambodia (Cambodia)
 Cambodia architech (Vietnam)
 Khmer art symbols (verizon.net, USA)
 building Cambodia new Khmer architecture (Cambodia)
Khmers are high artistic and inventive people.
 Cambodia architecture (Philippines)
 viettel post o Campuchia (Vietnam, www.ictnews.vn/)
 Cambodian architecture diagram (comcast.net, Washington, USA)
 modern Khmer architecture (comcast.net, Illinois, USA)
 Cambodia animation (Malaysia, www.leamus.com/)
 Arts architecture of Khmer (Cambodia)
 modern architecture in CAMBODIA (angkornet.com.kh, Cambodia)
 what + is + the + most + acurate + way + to + express + pi (nhs.uk, NHS Your Health)
 student + is + attitude + toward + "mathamatic" (Thailand)
 pi + et + force + centrale (asahinet.or.jp, Japan)
It doesn't appear obviously but this problem is the basic point root proving that until now, science ignore wholy the fundamental circular property of the universe space.
An universal Central Force is the negation of the concrete discrete space. A center is not a center if it is not defined. This point center is then obly the point where the Hasard will occur anywhere. This is no more than the universe depending to the Nothingness or Infinity. Nothingness is only a concept of NoSpace. Paradoxically current science for example the Dynamics, where it rests on the universe described as Movement. It is because movements are the reality of concrete space distances. And really Movement as the Newton's Force, is no more than undefined. The Dynamics is then the attempt to describe the Relativity where nothing exist without being refered to some other thing, that in turn is no more defined because of their relativity. This is only the eternal existence of the hazardeous central force that finally was supported in its extremum bad effect, by the Einstein theory.
The Pi is no more than a exercice joke to get one unknown circular relationship in space.
But with the Space Constant, it should be disavow such current false science concepts.
 Calculating + Spatial + Resolution (..)
There are to much reasons to expose if the Dakhiometry Spatial Language have to be exposed.
However, it is the main tool appropriate tool for the universe Science.
Considering that the Spatial Language is direct manipulation of the universe real Space because this tool is no more than accessing directly the universe Space according to an homothetic sample of this Space.
It is not the case for the old Geometry. This latter is only a cobventional drawing that of figures replacing the words of a given talking language. That is to tell the Geometry may more efficient if one replaces it by cartoons or diagrams. Geometry is only a conventional incomplete language as like for the different Number systems. There, the symbols are only conventions. Like the modern numeric systems, that is no more than conventional technique for defining words that may carry any conventional meaning.
With the Spatial Language the difference is that this latter allows to directly work on the universe Space by using it on direct homothetic samples. The universe Space has precise basic alphabets when are used allows the direct understanding of the universe phenomena.
It is why the Dakhiometry Spatial Langauge can transforms the real Space for its constructions as the nature can do it. For matter transformations, it can perforem the addition, Substarction, the Multiplication and the Division by using directly the Points, Lines and Curves for defining Aeras and Volumes of any Forms.
The squaringCircle can be completly resolve according to the Spatial Language. There is more definitions about the SquaringCircle that is not exposed in texts of this this web site.
One can not clamed that hi is inventing the Suaring the Circle and consequently the Pi Value, if he dont know completly the Spatial Language... because the Squaring a Circle is directly the consequences of the Spatial Language Definition. There are more interesting consequences about the SquaringCircle that are not yet exposed here. Particularly the squaringaCircle directly from pure circle elements.
This is to tell that without the Circular kknowledge there is no possible some ideas on the transformation of Circle into a square.
The fundamental truth is that with the current Mathematics the Squaring a Circle is really Impossible.
It not due to mathematicians lack of imagination.
It is fundamentally due to the Mathematics ignorance on circular property ! The Circle is not simply from the machanical Compass.
In fact, it is one of many method to resolve the squaring a circle (C) done in Dakhiometry. The purpose is to construct the Space Constant length AP from reasons found in the circlesquare structure. The square transformed from (C) has AM as side.
 modern geometry constuctions (otenet.gr, Greece)
There is no spatial construction limit according to that space is structured and in any situation an universal structure can be precisley determined as reference of construction. And more, the four basic transformation operations is also properties of space. Therefore, with a more better acquaintance with the space properties human science can understand more easily natural phenomena and also construct his projects according to precise universal laws. This a reality fact and not an another modern ideology.
 rational + value + of + pi (Qatar)
 "Mathamatic" + concept + of + zero
 "Mathamatic" concept of numbers (India)
 what + happens + when + I + take + the + length + times + width + and + the + "suqare" + root (USA)
You throw away the root, find length=width and finally get a square as remainder.
Conclusion:
We had gotten this formula according to spatial analysis of the Spatial Constant, given by the squaring a circle.
What is done there:
We was doing there the reciprocal of this formula according to the same spatial method.
It consists to find from a square, the basic remanences of circle from where a square is structured: the Space Constant. Because in a square, there is no known data to determine this Constant (3.12...) while only the circle properties allow to get it. In brief, a square can be transformed into a circle only and only, when a squaring a circle is yet known.
This is why until now, no mathematician succeeded to resolve the squaring a circle. All had trying to do the sqarring a circle, in tempting to make a ligne look like to a curvilinear one! That is to say: everyone had tempting to do the circling a square without knowing the squaring a circle.
You have gotten there the Mystery on the IMPOSSIBILITY of a squaring a circle!
The above Space Constant formula is really a spatial formula. It is a new aspect given by the Dakhiometry never known until now and obviuosly, is not a conventional Algebraic formula.
 "perfact" circle (USA)
All the numerical values that we meet along the squaring a circle are only used because of the standard habit of Algebraic an Arithmetics only known by the current Mathematics.
But really, it is shown here that calculation by spatial construction is the full rationnality of any universe quantity. This rests on a matter space fully defined as dicrete and absolute in location.
 can i get yo number (USA)
 square root (Canada)
 complicated math (USA)
 Xradius diffraction introduction geometry reciprocal space image (USA)
Reciprocal space is used as description for Crystal Lattice network in Xradius measurements.
 extraterrestrial + "prrof"
 why+pi+is+rational
 pi+is+rational
 exact+rational+value+of+pi
 most+accurate+values+ for+ pi+ calculation
 "mathamatic" + problems + for + find + out + ratios (USA)
 triangle unit circle (USA)
If we can construct an unit circle of radius=1, then any inscribed triangle must necessarry of decimal dimension below 1.
In Dakhiométry it can be calculated figure also of any scale known as decimal measurements. It is why there is no possibility of irrationnal dimension because space element is located always by a precise point. Therefore, if there was mathematics irrationallity it is due to the Numbers. These latter are created by human language that can't have the hyper high spatial resolution as for the universe discrete matter.
The true basic proof of circle Aera
The circle aera proof can be done only when a Space Constant is known. This latter allows to do the squaring a circle. Next, with the Space Constant the squaring a circle can appear. This step is the event of the possible measurement conscience for knowledge of the universe. Finally, according to the measurement possibility of a Space Constant as reference, the circle aera can be now formulated.
 Origin + of + the + value + of + PI Greek + word + for + circumfrence (India rbn gov)
 natural circle with diameters (USA Kansas)
 Pi + the + whole + calculation (USA so California)
 Squaring the circle, why (SouthAfrica)
 spatial structure (China)
 circle "area" equations (Canada)
 simple + proof + circle (insatnet.de, Germany)
 images with circle and rectangles (York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada)
 basic design composition with circle and "regtengle" and "squers" (Jordan)
 spatial structures (wbt.ru, Russian Federation, http://www.iassstructures.org/)
 most + exact + value + of + pi (Singapore)
One of the first practical application with such precise value, is to inroduce it in technology. At first, it is to have an international agreement to define a circle with this new value, for example include it in any mathprocessor and in digital processes programs as for any C.A.D used for technology conception.
This is a vast challange as industrial job to correct the current mathematic defaults.
Without this necessary task, any Mathematics enhancement will not be really useful. There are actually a huge amount of enhancements.
How to calculate the circle aera?
Well, for the new year 2008, it is time for all human on the Planet to use the most logic simplicity of spatial language to prove the circle aera formula.
Considering this next figure and with the Lamca theorem giving the equivalent rectangles from a square, the circle aera is directly given in the circlesquare spatial structure.
On this next figure, we have:
the aera (S) of the square is
S = AM^{2}
According to the Lamca theorem, this square aera (S) is equal to the rectangle one of sides AP and AD.
 cicrcle + with + pi + in + the + middle (uua.com.au, Australia)
 Robot vision equivalent rectangle (Taiwan)
It is a practical means for robot image processing precise calculation.
 rational root theorem (USA)
Therefore:
S = AM^{2} = AP.AD
This formula given by the Lamca theorem, is proving that a chord AM squared in the circle (C) is equal to the product of segments on its diameter AD=2R, divided by the height MP from summit M. (R) is the circle (C) radius.
According to the squaring a circle, the square aera is equal to the circle (C) one.
circle (C) Aera = AP.AD
 "cirle" "area" (United Arab Emirates)
 applied mathematics formulas (area) (Bloomsburg Univ. of Pennsylvania, USA)
 what is the formula for a solid circle (Time Warner telecom, USA)
You are quite true. Any spatial form is fundamentally solid objects. It is because space locations are basically discrete matter that we can have conscience and can measure any real thing. Then because a circle is a solid, the one of all the solid locations that define it, than we can measure its diameter.
 aera + of + a + circle (usda.gov, United Departement of Agriculture, USA)
It suffice now to examine this figure to read and express the theorem of circle aera. This latter is directly defined in the space structure when the squaring a circle is resolved.
With AP = SpaceConstant,
the aera of the circle (C) is there precisely equal to:
circle (C) Aera = (Space Constant).(2R)
Or practical expressed:
The aera of a circle is equal to its Diameter time the Space Constant.
 "area" equation (USA nj)
 formula for "area" (USA nj)
This statement seems to be strangely an erroneous one.
However, it is exactly true! Why?
a)  Note that the squaring a circle can be done with the condition that the square aera is equal to the aera and/or the circonference of the initial circle. Therefore this above statement is a quite exact and precise one.
b)  To prove it, consider this next figure. This latter shows that the diameter AD of circle (C) is equal to it radius squared (R^{2}).
 true basic (HongKong)
 perimeter of a circle (Canada, Ontario, Hamilton McMaster Univ.)
 demonstration + of + the + "area" + of + circle (South Africa, Cape Town, African Institute for Mathematical Sciences, aims.ac)
 circle "area" formula (HongKong)
 mathematical pi (k12.wi.us, Wisconsin, USA)
 Regular + solid + whose + surface + area + is + 4 + Pi + times + the + radius + "suared" (btcentralplus.com, UK)
 mathematical algorithm morphing art (rimatde.net, Spain)
Actually. The universal Space properties are immutable. The consequence of which is being abble to morph in unbounded manners. In fact, Space is immutable as defined exactness in Changes.
 Africane Institute for Mathimatical Science (Ethiopia)
 MATHEMATICAL MODEL MECHANISM Deduction Induction (bell.ca, Streetsville, Canada)
 rolling circle mechanism (Vietnam, http://utminers.utep.edu/)
 model matematic (Poland)
 the + expression + TT.r2 + gives + the + area + of + a + circle + with + radius + r (pacbell.net, California, USA)
Let us construct the square of side (AD') formed by the intersection of (C) with the unit axis (u). According to the Lamca theorem,
AD'^{2} = A(u).AD
In this case of figure we can write it as:
AD'^{2} = AD
The diameter of (C) is defined as equal to 4, its radius R is thus R=2.
With A(u)=1 then, we have AD'= OD'= R.
Explainations:
Because we have according to the squaring a circle:
aera (C) = AM^{2} = AP.AB = AP.AD = Pi.AD
with AP=Pi and also:
AD = (AD/2)^{2} = (AD^{2})/4
Thus, with AD=4,
circle aera = Pi.AD = Pi.(AD^{2}/4) = (Pi/4).AD^{2}
As the squaring a circle happens when the square aera is equal both to the circle aera and its perimeter then,
square aera = circle aera = circle perimeter
or
[(Pi/AD).AD^{2}]_{aera} = (Pi.AD)_{perimeter}
 mathematical pi (maine.edu, USA)
 Proofs without words area of circle (Australia, New South Wales)
circle Perimeter or circle aera
The Perimeter of a circle is equal to its Diameter time the Space Constant.
circle perimeter = (Space Constant).(Diameter)
While stating only the circle aera we get both the aera and the perimeter of the circle ones! Therefore, reading directly from the squaring a circle structure we get the basic complete two circle theorems as follows:
circle disk Aera
The aera of a circle is equal to its Diameter squared time the Space Constant divided by 4.
circle aera = (Space Constant/4).(Diameter^{2})
Note that space is a matter. Therefore, a curve or a line is formed by successive elemental matter. An elemental matter is a cube of unit dimensions. Then, any point of space is seen at least as a square. Therfore, a curve and a line is also an aera formed by successive elemental unit squares.
 mathematical "area" (k12.ca.us, California, USA)
 person who figured out the equation of a circle (Canada)
This is the just and important expression.
Actually, until now notions of a circle are conventional and abstract ones. From there it throws up the irrational and transcendental number problems because it was stated that these types of numbers can't be geometrically constructed.
In opposition to these Mathematical opinions here in this text, the circle is rationally constructed with concrete space elements. Therefore and really, the circle can be figured out concretly from space.
In Dakhiometry it is proved rationally that ANY NUMBER as language symbols, that are no more than Matter Quantities, can be defined and constructed with space elements.
While matter is discrete in hyperfinesse, however there is no hole or no gap in a line according to the Succession Principle logic.
 "perfact" circle (Canada)
 Pythagorean Theorem formula for "stupid" people (Canada Nearnorthscools)
 calculus "area" curvilinear (Thailand)
 the + ratio + "og" + "thwo" + sides + lenghts + of + the + triangle + is + AB%3A+BC+is+2%3A5 (USA wednet edu)
May be, the ratio of two sides in a triangle is the ratio of the square root of this two sides squared.
 circle + surface (Israel)
The circle aera is a reality.
The basic reason is as follows:
Because there is a sphere aera and as a sphere is formed by successive circles then the logic states that; The sphere aera is composed of successive circle aeras
Application
A sphere aera can be calculated with an algorithm using successive circle aeras.
Algebraic Integral calculus is only an approximation. There is proof using straight edge and compass that shows precisely a such aera construction of the sphere. From that, one can define any part of a such spherical aera.
Statement of the Space Constant
 mathematics is the language of nature pi (Mexico)
This is a Fact. The Space Constant is from the universal spatial language, the one of the life talking. Life talks when creating.
 give statement of pi (Bhutan)
The Space Constant is a more fertile basic space property than what is known with the Anciant Pi. This latter is only a means for measurement of a circle.
The universe matter space is a whole absolute precise locations for defining precisely any object construction according to structure and quantity of matter conservation. Without precise location in space, there is no possible conservation law. Space is not a passive property. In the contrary, space is the concrete reality of the universe Potential. We must keep in mind that any space location should be a means of potential measurement and its direct transform that is the Kinetic Energy. If there is no absolute space property then, there is no possible measurement of length, no potential and no means of measuring kinetic energy.
Therefore, if there is the necessity of an absolute space, there is also and necessarily, some Space Constant that play the role of scale reference. It is only the property of the universe Uniqueness Principle. So one should consider the result of the squaring a circle is to find out the most fondamental space property that allow to describe precisely a relatonship between circular realm and the linear one. The following Space Constant statement is to underline the absolute discrete placements of elemental locations allowing the whealthy of forms in the universe.
 physical meanning (Egypt)
 transmutation circle (Slovak Republic)
 pi + needs + to + be + accurate + to + define + a + pie + chart (btcentralplus.com, Uk)
The Archimedes' pi is accurate within 1/10 (3.1...) what ever are the decimal digits of a computer used.
Why is it fundamental to name the SpaceConstant?
 Pi + the + breath + of + the + universe (Australia)
In Fact, there is nothing else than the SpaceConstant. The Pi is only man anecdotal history.
Here is why it is rational to be in consciousness of a SpaceConstant.
The spacecontant is explained all along this text. However practically nobody means it.
Here on this next figure it is proved why a spaceconstant is constant because it is the reminiscent of the universe Permanent principle. In fact the spaceconstant is a direct avatar of the absolute space structure represented by the circle/square system.
From the absolute space the cercle/square structure is immutable. this means that any ratio between circle and square points that are refered to the common center, is a constant whatever the scale of this circle/square system.
Thus:
Any ratio from the circle/square is a Space Constant !
Particularly, the two caracterized circle denoted as (C1) and (C2) are representative to this structure constancy.
Consequently,
The ration (AC/AD) represent the space constancy of circle/square system.
In any figure scale, there is the identity according to the homothetie of circle/square system.
So,
In any space scale, the circle/square system is a constancy in their form ratios.
With AD=4, the spaceconstant is written as:
SpaceCst = (AC/AD) = (3.1201937.../4 = (Pi/4)
where (3.12019...) is the new value attributed to the socalled anciant Pi.
This figure show why in any figure scale the spaceconstant is truly immutable and consquently the SpaceConstant is a true universe Fact.
Important
It should be noted that the two circles (C1) and (C2) is the proof that the squareroot of 2 is a Constant.
Therefore, the (square root of 2) is a rational quantity because a constancy is necessarily a rational precisely determined value.
Therefore, the Socrate's incommensurable unit square diagonal is only the proof that the space constant was still ignored.
 prove square root of x (bresnan.net, Bresnan Communication, USA)
The Dakhiometry proof of square root construction is yet done! However, because of the coagulated Pythagoras' theorem maniac, no mathematician have some insight into it.
Statement of SpaceConstant T_{T}
Constructions in space are done in successive locations with two characteristics. There are two independent space placements: the linear and the curvilinear.
Relationship between linear and curilinear successive locations in lines, are in ratio related together in proportion with the Space Constant denoted as T_{T}. The two characters T means Transmutation. This latter is an unique key for the possibility of equivalence between linear and curvilinear figure.
Example of curvilinear aera (S) of circle and the volume (V) of sphere:
T_{T} = 4[S/(D^{2})]
T_{T} = 6[V/(D^{3})]
 is r2 TT the same as TT r2 in the formula for the area of a circle (wildblue.net, WILDBLUE)
These above (T _{T}) for aera and volume show that space is characterised by two realms that are the Linear and the curvilinear oneS. As space is the universal unity then it must be some relationship linking these two space forms. A such something should be universal and should not be particular arangements in space construction.
It is why this space unity is the simple spatial constant denoted here ad the (T _{T}). This is a new concept that has nothing to do with the Anciant Pi attached to the difficulties of measuring a circle.
Aside this theorical statement for the Constant (T _{T}), its uniqueness is also illustrated in practice. It can be proved in Dakhiometry that this Constant can be discovered in a linear spatial structure without any circle. Therefore this next raltionship:
can be given by the structure used by the "spatial calculator" of the Dakhiometry. This latter is only a linear structure in a square inhreited from the squaring a circle. The calculatore needs not the necessity of using any curvilinear tools as surface and perimeter of a circle.
The (T _{T}) is really The Universal Spatial Constant.
It has a wealthy consequence when it is understood. Because if universal laws are expressed only in a Two Dimension Planes, any 3Dimensions volume needs the necessity of a mixted Linear and Curviliear unity. For example a planar latice of a solid can be stay in a plane, the whole solid can be formed by other latice planes that can extended in any other direction.
Thus the final solid is necessarily a form of mixted linear and curvilinear types. Therefore, the construction of the universe objects is possible only according to this Spatial Constant, denoted here as (T_{T}), that allows the coherence of space unity.
It is why knowing that, the Dakhiometry can define and state simply any solid volumes. The old mathematician Pi is a too poor empirical concept and can define volume only through analogy with some few linear solid forms as did Archimedes when trying his Famous Method.
A more logical statement
 birth + of + a + square (India)
Fundamentally
The circle transmutes in structure to reveal space elements in possible conscience of measurement. This is the birth of a square the Anciants denoted as the life birth. The meaning of the squaring a circle from that measurement conscience in space was possible. Therefore, the statement of the squaring a circle should be as follows!
The linear space is from a curvilinear transformation. It consists to correspond successive points on curve to successive points on a straight line. This equivalent transform is defined according to a Space Constant (T_{T}), as following:
Examples of curvilinear aera (S) of circle and the volume (V) of sphere,
equivalent to linear diameter (D), as:
T_{T} = 4[(S)/(D^{2})]
T_{T} = 6[(V)/(D^{3})]
Consequences of these precise definitions of circle.
We can now define the differents aeras in a circlesquare structure as the surface elements (a) and (b) show on this next figure.
Let S the square total aera.
The total aera parts (a) of the square aera external to the circle one is:
S(1T_{T}/4)
Thus, the total aera part (b) of the circle is:
s(T_{T}/4)[S(1T_{T}/4)] = S(T_{T}/2  1)
Their perimeters are also directly defined. More complexe aera may be tempted according to the following example.
 federation square structure (Taiwan, National Chiao Tung University)
With these formula we can verify that the aera of square of side 4 is equal to four time the aera of square of side 2.
By adding the yellow and the cyan colored aeras in the little square of side 2, we can find their total as equal to the aera of side equal to 4.
Note that with the classical Pi=3.1416, it can not be done a such equality.
The usual Pi and its related Diamater is only a simple particular recipe.
Because it is the Dakhiometry's Space Constant, the Squaring a circle is a space gate in the universe.
 mathematic (Viêtnam)
This world is chained up by an old Pi trick. Here is a conjecture that can be resolved true with the Space Constant cencept:
Can you resolve the Squaring an ellipse?
It is a problem resolved as true by the Dakhiometry with straight edge and compas. Youn can't escape from it according to any impossible theorem.
This whole world is outmoded idea with a general erroneous Pi warranted by any calculator, while the reality of precise science should get into the Space Constant concept.
So your duty is to try resolving the following problem:
The squaring an Ellipse.
 tangent + passing + simultaneously + through + Parabola + ellipse + hyperbola (operamini.net)
These figure are wholy inscribed in the space structure. They can be constructed precisely. Therefore, a common simultaneously tangent at these sfigure can be determined by construction.
 ultimate + value + of + pi (USA)
So I will soon do the proof of squaring an ellipse. It shows how form transformations need the Space Constant.
 prove tangent circle ellipse (Spain, Universitat Politechnica Catalunya)
This a new marvellous consequence of the Space Constant.
After resolving the squaring an ellipse, the problem of a tangent to an ellipse is directly the one of a circle. Therefore, from any given point exterior to the circle, tangent point of a circle is the coresponding point for an ellipse. As we know how to construct a tangent to a circle we can immediatly deduce the tangent point on its correspondent ellipse. This is done by simple, easy and precise spatial construction.
 space constant (USA Illinois)
You will see that the space constant is a most usefull key for understanding the solid form.
 Surface d'un segment de cercle (USA mil)
Je le vous dirai lorsque j'aurais exposé les surfaces et les volumes des solides, après les avoir justifié sur des fondements. La Constante de l'Espace, y joue un grand rôle principal.
 measurement + "og" + common + geometrical + forms (Hongkong)
 qu'estce + que + exprimer + la + longueur + 1 + d'un + cercle + comme + fonction + linéaire + de + son + radiuson + R (France)
 un cercle de 0 degrees (mindspring.com, Canada)
Mon œil.
Même en géométrie des parallèles se rejoignant à l'infini, on ne peut faire de telle prouesse..
Maintenant, essayez de tracer un trinagle de 60 degrés en tout, somme de ses trois angles, vous verrez que vous ne pouvez plus dormir.
Cependant, un cercle de 60 degrés peut se faire dans une Géométrie où l'angle droit est égale à 30 degrés. Essayez d'abord de fabriquer une telle Géométrie... où l'on perd non seulement le Nord mais aussi, son Latin. Il est possible que le jour où le mathématicien, las, avait renoncé à monter une telle folie à 30 degrés et après avoir vidé toutes ses bouteilles à 55 degrés seulement, qu'il se résignait à revenir vers sa Géométrie sagement sphérique.
On this next figure is represented a length of Space AP.
Squaring a circle of perimeter unit will give necessarry a Unit of straight Length.
Thus, with this unit Length=1 a circle perimeter=1 and diameter (2R) will gives the value of the inverse AP as:
2R=1/AP
It is here, only a particular case construction because in Dakhiometry there is a general compact and precise structure for doing the four basic operations for construction. Negative length are only conventional definition of a line and a plane divided into two parts.
 can't divide by zero (Missouri, USA)
Effectively, A universe Principe can be founded on.
A Unit Length is an eternal being... it is also the case for the circle of perimeter Unit.... The unitsquare is always valid whatever are the Circle AP dimensions.
There is never Zero division according to the Elemental matter as a Permanent Matter Unit. The Elemental matter Dakhion is from the Universe Permanent Principle of the Discretness of Matter. Conservation Priniples rest on such Universe Discretness of Matter Foundation.
The Dakhiometry Spatial Language rest on the Lines, Curves as formed by continual successions of elemental Matter. The Principle of Lines and Curves is that they are formed by Elemental Matter Dakhions. The Dakhion is defined as ThePreceedingSucceeding Element. With such base any complex constructions in the universe can be understood as formed from such Property of ONE DAKHION as ThePreceedingSucceeding Matter unit. This is the characteristic of dynamic Active Matter Element for unbounded Construction in the universe.
 exhaust planes construction (Brazil)
 construct the inverse of a length, geometry (utexas.edu, Texas, USA)
 Complex Elliptic Inverse line (Singapore)
 the fully elliptic differential governing equations (Philippines)
 Singapore (Indonesia)
 i divided by zero (bell.ca, Quebec, Canada)
The solution here is a true one according to the theorem of the circle always defined by three points.
When three points are on a line then this line is the maximum circle of the universe with the maximum universe length as diameter. When this three points are on a same location then it is the ultimate elemental circle.
The theorem is:
Three points define always an unique circle because they define the total space directions.
Practically it appears as:
a)  By its form any three points define an unique circle.
b)  The total inside angles formed by any three triangle sides define an unique circle.
 dvide by zero (Denmark)
This is the result of rational spatialconstruction that rests on the basis of the circle as 3points.
Also, for example, the consequence of this theorem proof gives rise to the simple spartial explaination of the Morley equilateral trisector in a triangle.
 1 divided by zero equals infinity (Philippines, http://i270.photobucket.com/)
This proof is really a valid one with the Dakhiométry spatial construction.
a)  The Dakhiometry universe is discrete matter.
b)  First, it is proved that any three points determine a given circle.
c)  Then, three aligned points determine necessarily The Determined Circle or the Greatest rational universe Circle.
Because the universe is discrete then, it is more just to denoted this circle as the logic of the Great universecircle. The Infinity is an old Anciant notion when they ignored that the Space is absolute.
Proof of (1/Zero) as the diameter of the Great Universe circle diameter
The shortest proof but he most basic logic one rests on the universe discrete absolute space. Space is Distance and Direction. According to the curvilinear succession of space points the law is stated as follows:
1)  Two successive curvilinear points (A) and( B) determine any circle passing on this two points.
2)  A set composed of a Third successive point (C) to the first two successive points (A) and B), determines an unique circle containing this set of three successive points.
Corollary:
According to the succession principle applyed to the curvilinear line, a)  Any third point (P) in the sucession chain to the first two (A) and (B) successive points determine necessarily the unique circle (ABC).
b)  Consequently to the property of a curvilinear succession chain, Any three points in curvilinear succession, determine an unique circle.
The logic property of discrete point succession is then use to prove that the Universe Great Circle is also rationally determined according to any three given points.
 circles inside giant circlecircumfrence (comcast.net, Michigan, USA)
On this figure, is shown that 3 points A, B, and C difine a circle circumscribed to them.
As a circle is a total of 180 degrees of Directions then the total 3 angles of a triangle is necessarily equal to 180°. This property of 180°, is used to prove how to determine the Universe Great Circle.
On the left of the figure, let ABC a triangle inscribed in a circle. It is shown how the three angles (A, B and C) can feel the total 180° of a circle. Note that the total circle direction can be conventionally define as any given value. But the real total discrete points of a circle can be the gratest of the universe points quantity. It is a currently bad defined as an uncommeasurable Infinity. However, the Dakhiometry define this socalled uncommeasurable Infinity by the ratio (1/zero) quantity.
For 180° angles definition of the triangle form it can be written as the arcs lengths BA, AC and CB. Thus:
arcs (BA + AC + CB) = 180°
At the figure rigth is shown how to define the universe Great Circle by choosing 3points (A, B, C) on a line. It can be seen that "line" (ABC) should belong to the universe Great Circle according to the above law.
Because the total angle defined by this cyclic 3points is:
(arc BA) = 1 elementpoint
(arc AC) = 1 elementpoint
(arc CA) = 180°
Finally:
arcs (BA + AC + CB) = 180°
This is the circle central symmetry characteristic of total direction. It traduces the cyclic of the circularsuccession that has neither Beginning nor Ending.
Conclusion
A)  A, B, and C define necessarily a circle according to that threepoint in curvilinear succession define one unique circle.
B)  According to the following theorem of inverting length, then the ration (1/zero) is necessarily the Greatest Circle diameter of the Discrete and finite universe.
Important property
At the universe scale There is no more distiction between linear and curvilinear mode. This a logic consequence that can explain why the immutable elemental matter activity is done along a straight line. This allows to state that the electromagnetic action comming from far away stars hit the Solar system in perfect straigth line manner. Only refraction in media can deviate the media light phenomena.
 discretness (Ukraine)
 Exploring Arcs, Chords, Secants and Tangents (Philippines)
 modernism unique spatial object (Australia)
 divided + by + zero (Mexico)
 result + prove + unicity (Philippines)
You justly see it.
Univers Fact is the expression of Uniqueness principle. It is the base Reason of Physics to understand that matter is necessary existing in Discretness of its Elements.
Equality is not a man's artificial simple talking word. Because matter composed and formed from a same matter Element, denoted as the Dakhion, is the foundation of human's Equality concept. Univers is a Whole of matter Elements. From there Uniquenes of the the matter Element imply that Uniqueness has necessary the Permanence property.
Note that it is the consequence from the fulness reason of the Uniquenes as follows:
1)  Necessarily, the Reason of Unique concept is not in two or in many Forms as Existence/Or/Nonexistence.
2)  Therfore, a Unique has then necessarry and stricly the property of OneExistence.
It is why from this basic Reason,
DISCRETNESS OF MATTER MEANS THAT THE WHOLE UNIVERSE IS STRICTLY A PERMANENCE FACT.
Note that whithout a such foundation, Knowledge is impossible because this man's capacity of knowing rest on the EQUALITY Principle. It is why man's know how to Count. Counting rest on the Unity principle. Counting Unity rest no more than on the basic Fact of Discrete Matter.
 Zero + in + mathematics (..)
Considering the discret universe fulness, there is the noabscenceofmatter. The first quantity of matter is one elemental matter. Therefore, there is not a ZeroQuantity in the universe. The presence of matter is from Permanent principe.
In algebraic mathematics method, the Quantity is represent by a language symbol denoted as Number. Converted talking language words by Numbers to any quantity had difficulty when one need to represent larger amount of quantity that a man can have a practical access.
It is why the problem of practically using Numbers to represent any possible quantity need to invent practical symbol of defining how to represent Number for great Quantity because it is impossible to invent a great amount of conventional words to represent any great Quantity of the universe.
Finally it was invented in Indian the conventional symbol that allows to define a rule for representing Great Quantity. The symbol is nothing else than the one that allows to use an amount of words that can be use in cyclic manner. This symbol is like the clock that is abble to indicate hours all along the unbounded Time. Thus, for counting Numbers it was the Indian Zero invention that allows to write withh some simple symbol to represent any great possible counting.
The Zero is therefore, NOTANUMBER.
The Zero is only a symbol mark on a clock cadran that allow to represent any great quantity of Time while this concrete mark has not any Time property.
 divide + by + zero + jokes (Australia)
The basic reason for any science is that the universe is the one of Discrete matter.
That means if there was not any matter then there is no universe because the universe matter is a Quantity et not some nothingnesse. The ultimate matter is at least One Elemental matter. This latter is necessary this elemental quantity.
Therefore, the space a composed by elemental Point, Line and Forms is at least define by One elemental Quantity.
The Zero is only an useful but conventional symbol that allows to define a mode of cyclic counting of quantities. It is then an illusion to divide a Number by a Zero as NotaNumber. This transformation between quantities should then be a coherent and homogeneous one by matterinteraction or mutual QuantitiesInteractions. The ultimate of a possible division is necassary the dividedbyanelementalquantity and never by a Zeroasanillusionofquantity.
The Proof of Absolute Space
 what + is + a + contradiction + in + math (scbglobal.net, Texas)
Science should rests on the Absolute universe space of the Discrete Matter. In the universe, any objet is always defined at least, by one element of Matter. There is no object of ZeroMatter. This is the principle of the universe Absolute Space.
And the absolute Space can be rationally proved as true.
How do we do to get this rational proof?
Even if it seems that anything in the universe are alway changing and that anything is appearing and vanishing in motion as life and death evens, the Absolute Fact of the universe space can be rationally proved.
This proof of the space Absolute property consists to rationally define that there is, at least, only OneFactofMatterPermanentProperty in the Space.
This basic prof is yet already done!
This is done according to the Determination of the Space Constancy that allows the universal transformation between two basic Forms as the mutual transformation between Circle and the Square.
This isreally the mains aims of the squaring a circle resolution. The so called old "Pi" is only a secondary consequence among a lot of another ones.
Therefore,
According to this proved Fact,
1)  As any object reality is at least defined by the minimal One Matter Element.
2)  Then, there is no Zero of Matter. Therefore, the continuity of matter construction is the rational fact of the universe reality. The construction are always the possibility of matter transformations according to the processes of (Addition, Substraction, Multiplication and Division).
3)  There is no impossible mattertransformation according to the universal laws in the whole universe. Paricularly, there is no impossible Division by Zero.
In conclusion
The Zeroisnotanumber but only the ultimate one elemental matter: the dakhion. This give rise to the definition of the minimal One Point that necessary constitutes Lines and Curves in the Space.
Inverse of length
Note
This construction is directly derived from the Lamca theorem. It allows to state an usefull theorem for inverting any length AP!
On this next figure, are done the inverse of circle diameters length (a, b, c, d, e).
These constructions rest on a reference by a unit circle.
Theorem of inverting length
Let a first unit radius circle intersecting any other second circle.
Projections of these two circles intersections on their joinning center line, determine with the unit circle center, the inverse of the second circle diameter length.
 inverse ++ power + mathematic + equation
In Dakhiometry,
The Lamca theorem is also the direct basic reason of the circle power point theorem proof.
One can see that with all preceeding tools it can be done yet many precise constructions in space.
 definition of a line (NoDak.edu, USA)
Actually, theses constructions are consequences of a line definition.
A ligne defined from Pythagorean Numbers as (1, 2, 3, ..., n) that gives rise to the Euclidean line is not really a definition but a dream coming from empirical sensitive image of line. It is the case for a line unclosed by two infinities. These latter are virtual and empirical concept that rest on no reality fact.
Therefore, a line should be real when it is defined by its two ends. It was the Aristotle definition however it is concerning only for a segment of line.
The exact and precise definition of a line is:
A line is formed by the succession of discrete points situated between two end points.
This next figure concerning the inverse of a length, is in fact how to figure out any line.
This is to tell that there is no Segment of line.
For simplicity of language word one can named a length as a "Segment". But we should be in consciousness that it is only a Line.
According to the Pythagorean Numbers the curent Numbers theory gives a false concept of quantity. In Dakhiometry it can be shown that any segment contains the possibility of designating all the universe quantity until the discrete ultimate elemental point.
The Line of modern Real Numbers is only an empirical inheritance of the Anciants misreading about space line. Also, the Real Numbers Line is a bad construction because it is defined by a convergence method as was done by Euclide and Archimedes exhaustion method. The mathematician infinity is in fact born from these convergence methods as a conventional approximation, wellknown: "converge to a no touch taboo".
 how + could + you + find + the + circumference + of + many + circles + with + a + calculator + without + entering + 3.14 + for + every + problem (USA Alabama)
At first, the 3.14 is an erroneous value of a quite false mathematic product.
The principle in Dakhiometry and not the one of mathematics, is as follows:
1)  Any measurement of figure must start from a circle definition.
2)  It is necessary from that to define a square.
3)  Then from a square, one can define the measure of ONE circle.
Now we can proceed to choose and to define this circle as an unit circle.
From this circle characteristic and according to the Dakhiometry space transformation knowledge
Everybody can now measure any other circle, as a proportion of this unique previous defined circle without using no more the Space Constant T_{T}!
This is the universal magic immutable Space Constant property.
However
Note that all this new method remains quite inefficient even if one use the most Famous of most Great Anciant mathamatician invention, the Famous Number 3.14 of the Great Modern Conservative human though. Unhappily, independently of any reason, everybody is "free" to chose to what he want to obey to.
 corresponding + lengths + in + similar + figures + are + given.+ Find + the + ratios + (Figure+A+and+Figure+B)+ of + the + lengths + and + areas. + then + find + the + unknown + aera. (USA Georgia)
 the mathamatical country problem (Canada)
 human memory capacity (Slovak Republic)
Important Remark
One may note there, that spatial language is the most simple. However it needs the capacity of an overall vision of space to be abble to discover the wealthy basic space structure.
Discussion:
In a such figure, any square can give any rectangle of equal aera. Thus, the segment AP is of any length. That is to say: may any length AP be a SpaceConstant?
Actually, any chord AM squared can be equal to AP.AD.
However, the SpaceConstant needs the condition of equality between the square and the circle (C) aeras. And according to the construction of this Space Constant as a tangent to a defined circle (C1), this latter is precisely unique. Only this uniqueness of the Space Constant allows exactely the equality between the circle (C) and the square aeras.
The final result of these analysis is to give the basic proof of the Uniqueness of the Space Constant.
Therefore, we state a basic theorem proving that the squaring a circle is unique according to the uniqueness of the Space Constant.
In the circlesquare structure there is one and only one precise unique length that allows the direct unique circle to square transformation of same aera.
This length is denotted as the Universal Space Constant.
Although the spatial language simplicity it can be seen that the circularity of the universe Permanence, is of great complexities with all the reasons that are related together for the understanding of human though.
 "indution" + cooker + pi + and + pi + than + stop (Singapore)
 the value of pie used in maths (India)
Unhappily, all of this Planet world are yet practised the millenarry immutable an indestructible old erroneous Pi value...
 show me three hundred square root length (USA hr)
Heve you never seen somebody drawing a length of 300? Never, because 300 is a language numeral symbol.
However, the sqr(300) length is the one of sqr[(3).(100)] or sqr(3).sqr(100).
a)  It can be found by homothetic transform of the whole sqr(3) figure by Thales ratios.
b)  The Dakhiometry spatial method allows directly multiplication and division oprators.
 the + inverse + rotation + of + a + square + to + suffice + to + compute + any + product (USA Chicago)
 universal root (USA west)
Actually. What can be geometrically constructed was defined as a rational number. Therefore, every number is rationnal because any of quantity can be spatially constructed.
 math symbols  square root of 3 (Hawaii, Brigham Young University)
 an irrational length on the rational line (UK Canterbury ac)
 principle square root in math (USA Maine edu)
 the square root of three is one point (USA berry edu)
 rational square roots (India)
 algebra square root of, pictures (USA, Conecticut University of Hartford)
 "sqaure" root of three (mia.bellsouth.net, Florida, USA)
 drawing square roots (lewisu.edu, Lewis University, USA)
 radical is an irrational number square Socrates (comcast, Texas, USA)
 wawe do (Vietnam, http://img.photo.zing.vn/file_uploads/gallery/ w642h/q42008/2009/)
 wawe do (Vietnam, http://hanoicity.jaovat.com/muagapmotconwawedocohay)
  write + two + rational + and + two + errational + number + between + squar + root + 2 + bnd + squar + root + 3 (China)
Actually. This figure shows how to spatialy construct the length of quantity equal to square root of 3. We can do it with any length number of the universe.
In fact, anny quantity can be spatialy deternimed by a length as distance between two precise points. Therefore, any universe quantity, tell as a Number, is precisely a rationnal space length.
Until now, if there are irrational numbers it is because of Euclidean Division characteristic that is the never ended exhaustion method which can't drive to a precise number value.
 wawe do (Vietnam, http://img.photo.zing.vn/file_uploads/gallery/ w642h/q42008/2009/08/)
 roots of unity (USA, California, Montery College of the Desert)
This next figure gives 2root(1)=1.
Also there is a same construction that give any root of number below 1.
 how do i calculate the distance between two points on a straight line when we have the point a =root x1 = 14 and b = root 2 = 18 and the mid point of ab =16 whats the distance between om on the straight line ox (Australia)
 Proof + The + square + root + of + three + is + irrational
 square root with compass (Belgium)
In the discrete continuation, any quantity value from Zero to unlimited quantity can use a compass to get its square root. On this next figure, it suffices to construct the diameter of a circle using the given quantity value. Then a square is determined the side of which is the square root of this diameter. The square is constructed at point Zero and with the circle intersection at the vertical axis located on the value 1 as shown on this figure for the square root of 3.
In Mathematics, it was defined that any geometric construction is rational. Therefore, in the discrete continuity of a length exhaustion, one of many theorems on rational quantity is as follows:
Theorem of rational quantity Any quantity value from zero to unlimited ones, is constructed with a circle and is quite rationnal. There is no holes in a line.
Note that this theorem rests on the basis LamCa theorem.
 square root of five (USA Virginia)
Square root of 5 is done as for the 3 one on this figure by replacing the length 3 by the one of 5.
Square root of decimals are done with the same construction. It is because the decimal convention is only the homothetic for language of numbers. Number Languages are necessarry full of holes due to the impossibility to conventionally name the so numerous objects in continuity of space. While spatial homothetic property is recurrently continous even if space is discrete. The recurence principle is a principle of continuity of nohole spacereality.
 square root in digital technology (Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Hungary)
Digital technology is formatted by the usual means of Mathematics for calculations. Mathematics know only a few ways for calculations. There is the two main modes that are the Pythagoras' theorem and the sinecosine trigonomic functions. They give quantities as different dichotomic Numbers not being in continuity. This dichotomy is there called as irrational numbers.
It should be noted that in Dakhiometry, calculation of quantities are represented by spatial structure. A lenght resulting of calculation is found as a length representing directly a quantity. Length are there formed and delimited by continuity of discrete points. The square root of quantities are then directly given in space structure.
While with the Pythagoras's theorem it is given always as a squared or an inversed square numbers.
To be wholly precise with efficient calculation as in Dakhiometry, one needs to surpass the usual mathematical though of understanding the quantities in the universe.
Digital technologies for calculation are useful. But transposing calculation mode of space structure should be developped differently from the above a little simplistic methods used in Mathematics.
 does + a + circle + have + a + surface (USA)
It is a basic questionning. Do any line and any point have a surface?
Because the Ancients believed that Geometry was human invention and that any form is human mind product, Euclide had defined a point as an dimensionless entity. This was the case for Dedekind where Infinity is "proved" as his mind production.
However, the basic universe logic is necessary the Permanent Principle concept with the discretness of matter. A Permanent universe state should have the property of an absolute defined matter as the universe Space. Because only an absolute defined space can have the property of location. From this base it can be understood why there is Forms and how to have conscience on it by Measurement. Because of the conscience property by measurement, an absolute universe space is necessary a finite quantity. Human consciouness and measurement is necessary an acknowledge on a finite quantity. We note there that our conscience is the space construction and consciousness inherits the space property. Therefore, a discretness principe in a finit space, is necessary a discrete surface quantity in a discrete location for centering it in a whole defined space.
From these bases we can see that a dimensionless point can never be located. Thus it can't be measured because dimensionless point is unconsciousness and can't never be measured. The dimensionless point is the consequence of the Anciant' incapacity to know what is Space.
From a such bad foundation of space it grew the Continuum belief. And many examples of indefined space can be seen when Mathematics proved that "a Part is greater than a Whole" and also, the modern difficulty of defining the Real Numbers set where dimensionless point leaves a line made of holes from where Mathematics created the socalled many difined Infinity Sets. With the incapacity of knowing what is space, the old and modern Mathematics have no foundation to be classed as advanced sciences.
With the Dakhiometry one needs to be in acquaintance with the discretness of matter space. Any point and any line or curve are surface defined as object realities.
 why that counting's rational irrational are called Real numbers (Philippines)
Human have the skill for rhetorical figure of speach.
 root (USA California)
 root + 3 + rectangles (Canada)
 bankruptcy in integers (rr.com, USA)
Weird and false things are the irrationnal numbers!
You are invited to produce the hexadecimal integer series with a famous irrationnal number as the basic unit:
It is the famous irrationnal number that is to say the argument of the geometrical impossibilities of the squaring a circle and the doubling a cube.
Here is some examples:
With (n) the Natural Integer series from 1 to unlimited value,
Let
Now, consider this following given equality:
H ^{p}=2 ^{n}
Then, a series of the irrationnal (H) correspond exactly to a series of multiple hexadecimal Integer Numbers as follows.
Logics proof:
There is the real fact of Narural integer Numbers. Although Rational and Irrational numbers may be mixed on a line, these two types of number worlds are necessarily incommunicable between them.
If one can produce from irrational numbers some rational ones then, one produced there a contradiction to irrational numbers. The above examples show this contradiction. Therefore, Irrationality is only a FALSE FORMALISM.
This proves that there is a quite FALSE and virtual Irrational World built by Mathematicians with a False Euclidean Division method. This latter confusion gives rise to the current Irrationality Belief.
What is irrationnal...
is precisely the Human Irrationality Concept characteristic!
More serious:
This whole current World is guilty to be blind continually on all the rational reasons of science exposed by the Dakhiometry.
 how to count square root (Sweden)
 root square (Japan infoweb)
 straight edge square root (Netherland, Universiteit Twente)
Actually, any number of different series types can be applyed with this Rootn following formula as square root.
The following formula is under usual Algebraic form however, it can be spatialy constructed in figures. This give the best proof of rational and precise constructions for any length quantity representation. There, any line is really precisely the continuous formation of space quantity.
 triangular math root (Bulgaria)
There is here also three data for an equality equation.
 irrational + square + root + unlimited + precision (USA WOW)
 THE LAW OF LARGE NUMBERS  ANIMATION (Portugal)
Actually!
According to the current Theory of Numbers,
A Theorem of
Any Root n of Number (x), is statted as follows:
a) Where (n) is the Natural Number series form 1 to n.
b) And (p) is any number.
c) (Root p (x)) is noted as (rootwithexponent p of (x)).
Calculations Examples :
Example 1)  With x=9, p=15 and n=7
For Any conventional Number,
Example 2)  With x=7.51, p=11.75 and n=5.3
Pay attention:
It is there not a pleonasm. Because in Mathematics, an irrational number [root p (x)] is defined as a particular number quite different from an integer x.
Mathematician should define two different numbers:
(y)=[root p (x)], is an unknown trasformed from (x) through [root p (x)] according to some approximation Exhaustion and Convergence method.
Therefore in Mathematics, [root p (x)] is not the same x find in [x ^{n}].
For example, with mathematics irrationality as conventionally defined,
it should be necessarily a difference as follows:.
Conclusion
Really, if one find an equality between an Irrational number and an Integer one,
it is the proof that the famous Irrational Root of numbers is directly and concretly related and belong to the Rational Natural Integers. Therefore, there is not Irrational Numbers but only a bad Euclidean mathematic division method based on Exhaustion search.
Main conclusion in brief
Irrationality is not an universe fact.
Irrationality is only mathematicians' language ignorance of how to interpret the discrete Matter Continuity.
 quantique + dakhion (France Poitiers)
 take + a + line + and + form + it + into + a + circle + pi + is + missing + space (USA Washington)
There should not some missing space. If there is one, it comes from approximation practise.
Because the squaring a circle proves that there is Conservation of Space between the square S and the circle C. A Space Conservation is the meaning of equality between the two corresponding surfaces. Only the different arrangements of elemental points provide different lengths for their perimeters as:
[4.D] different to [Pi.D]
where 4>Pi.
 What + is + the + importance + of + Pi + 3.1415 + in + business (USA Tennessee edu)
The most fondamental reason of using constant reference is to choose of exact one on which all the universe laws should rest. It is the human science purpose because of its universallity reason of life reality.
However, human though is no more reaching a satisfying level to be abble to determine what are the basic of universality in law. Therefore we are all on Earth to use noexact sciences but generally conventionnal empirical and mechanical processes determined by the practical science for everydays actions.
In such situation, an example is seen in the case of the old Pi value of 3.1416. This latter is only an empirical value the truth of it is only validated as sacred value according to some traditional artificial mystery maintained by dogma.
The real value of the socalled Pi as a simple particular mathematics problem, is only how to find a trick that allows to give approximately a sufficient length value of a circle for practical measurement. On it there was fantasy of mathematicians that try to give some mathematical formalism to a Pi empirical value. It is why we can see many numeral processes formulating a Pi value the truth of which is according to the belief of somme mystery on which are founded Numbers.
The Pi was and is nothing than an empirical formalism replacing the human ignorance as the exact universallity of the world.
The truth is reached only when one can get what is the real conscienciousness of the physic around him. The most basic material presence that can never vanishe is what everybody can be sensitive. It is the material Space. Therefore, being conscious of the space is to know how to measure it and to act with and on it. We denoted it as the fundamental universal language of space. Because a real basic of language allows to exchange, to transform in uniqueness and multipilicity system.
In the case of understanding what is the basic importance of this space language, one get some basic characteristics that space is a whole. And being conscious of the total independence between rotation and linear movements in space. A real human science should be consciousness that in a whole space there should be some basic factor inscribed in space that links these two independent movements in a unified space system. In basic space language we tell that there is something that unifies the circle with a line or a square.
Resolving a such problem is telling as how to square a circle.
The solution of it gives to us a real basic factor of matter transformation universally used by the matter laws of the universe construction.
The resolution of a such facror is a precise value given directly the True, the One that whe should denoted as the Space Constant! Aside as such mode of resolution and a such founded value, there is only an abyssal of human ignorance.
It is the case of the Pi=3.1416 value, "universally" used by sciences and more badly, by the business world. The absolute error appears in the use of the old Pi and is of 0.7%.
Why it is bad for business?
Business is money. Money is only a product of calculation. Business is governing the human life. That is to tell, with the old empirical Pi used in their calculation the world is erroneously calculated. Precisely tell, our life id baddly and erroneously estimated. What is the value of an 0.7% absolute error done on a simple tiny billion of money of a very poor business?
The real effect of a such error is however governed by the universal Conservation of Action. This means that aside a great deficiency for one, in the other hand, there is a great profit for the other. A such unbalanced world may be conscious or unconscious for practical business activities. However, it is only a real chronic disease for life of all.
 history + of + mathematics + THE + PI + EVERYTHING + CONTAINING + PI + WHO + INVERTED + PI (South Africa)
 formulas + with + include + pi + give + the + formulas + in + symobols + and + tell + what + it + repusent (USA)
All of statistic mechanics use the Pi. Examples are given with the Gaus, Fermi, Dirac, Bose, Einstein, Maxwell, Bolzman,... ect. This Pi come from integral and trigonometric functions where one uses mathematic developments in calculations. All the modern particle sciences use an erroneous value of the old Pi.
I have no other comment about the exactness of these science methods.
 trig functions and ancient pyramids (USA)
Trigonometric functions and the old empirical Pi currently used, are the two main errors meet by the Trigonometry. We must add to these errors the imprecise Euclid's division algorithm when performing these functions using Number calculations..
Note that it is proved in Dakhiometry that a sine curve is precisely a paraboloc function.
The determination of Trigonometric functions doing with a circle and orthogonal axis is really a dummy formalism. The Trigonometry gives only approximative results.
It is why what do we think about the modern Algebraic calculation methods of convergence and function developments where the Trigonometric functions are intensively used? This is the case of the Mechanical Statistics found in Quantum Mechanics.
What is the form of an elemental immutable matter?
 can pi be constructed with a value of three (USA Florida)
It is rational and also most intersting to seek an answer for a such issue.
During the first time of a human practised techniques, he was yet meeting the everydaus problem of how to ajust a circle to a linear solid. The wheel is never beeing invented. Rotating and linear motion are the natural spatial characteristic of the alive movements and any alive have to manipulate curcular and linear solid forms. For example, everyone may experience a fall during that he is rollong on an inclined plane with his whole body. It is there that practically, everyone had invented the concret wheel running.
Even that one had skill to construct anything needed but his sciences of measurement was not yet precise. Therefore construction use mostly empirical recipes of defining solid forms. Adjusting a circular form to a linear one can be done with some approximation that run well for coarse needs. Thus, at the anciant time it was more easy to remember that a circle perimeter length can be conventionnally equivalent to three times its diameter. From these usual practise the circle perimeter as a proportion of its diameter remain until now. Because nobody can tell the exact means to measure a circular line then, the corresponding of a circle perimeter with its diameter became an remains until now as some mysterious trick for the human thought.
We have to retain that the perimeter as equal to three time its diameter, is only a recipes that feet well for what it is used.
Case of discrete elemental scale
 universal + conscience + quantum (USA Philadelphia)
 "unicerse" background (USA New York)
There is not a Nothingness in the universe.
Any heavenly body are location determined. Determination are done necessary on concrete reality. Therefore, exinstence in the universe must be done on some background reality. This latter is denoted as the universe breath of elemental matter, the principle of matter concretness reality.
However, I show here that in particular case, a circular measurement can be confused with an elemental discrete rotation. But a dakhion elemental matter displacement is not a circular line while the whole universe space is structured with both circular and linear form.
An ultimate elemental matter can't be concretly represented. However, according to the matter properties it can be logically represented. Therefore, it should be described with the following properties:
1)  It is a two dimensional form built by discrete length.
2)  It has the two basic elemantal motions: rotation and linear ones.
 immutable images (rr.com, Austin, Texas, USA)
This next figure logically represents an elemental immutable matter denoted here as an object AB.
This figure is composed by elemental length L, the elemental distance of a discrete space. The elemental matter AB is show with continous lines ended by two round as symbol of mass. The length AB is equal to two elemental lengths L. This is a logic of the discrete elemental matter. Because if the length AB is of one elemental length L then there is a contradiction in the discretness of matter. Matter is symmetric that is the two mass points should be symmetric to a center. Thus, if the length AB is of one L then, there is no center because there is nothing least situated between an elemental length L.
AB is necessarily the real logic elemental form of a dakhion.
Now AB should have the possibility of the two basic motions: le linear and the rotation ones. That is one point mass A and B should move in an elemental displacement L. Also, AB should rotate around its center O, but necessarry in elemental angle quantity (a). But because the displacement quantity L is necessarily the one of A and B then, the elemental angle (a) should ne determined by the linear elemental length L.
Finally, the elemental matter dakhion AB is represented on this figure with the basic discretness of matter property. The motion of AB is the trajectory of point A and point B relatively to its center O. We get necessarily a hexagonal figure of its elemental rotation. the rotation is a real one because it is a cyclic angular displacement.
It such case, if we do some approximation we can tell that one cycle can be compared as a circular trajectory. Therefore, in such condition, we can state that the perimeter of such cycle, is really equal to Three Time its diameter! This is the case of a hexagone figure.
This rotation is really a basic rotation. But it can be seen that A and B don't follow a circular line. A and B is displacing along linear polygonal trajectory. Therefore, rationnally it is contradictory to state that "Pi is three time the diameter of a circle".
We must retain that such figure of hexagone may be only choose as symbolic representation but it is not rational to associate it as scientific result.
 center of mass (Thailand)
This is actually the Gold Finger for New Ages.
All my works of the Dakhiometry is underestimated by the current sciences institutions. It's being going all along my life.
So, what have I do to reveal all the deep space understanding of the Dakhiometry to a world that take my Dakhiometry as a joke?
The Dakhiometry have nothing to do with the current Mathematics. It goes deep in the true space knowledge. More than theories, the Dakhiometry knowledge is an efficient science. Determining the gravity center of matter systems is the most wealthy application for human techniques. Knowledge of the center gravity determination is more than to make a great stride for industry. More, it is at least a new stride for human civilisation.
Therfore, what have I to do amongst this inertial Mathematical world, to prove and reprove, to demonstrate things for deaf ears?
 kuwait + law + of + vistuals + and + audio (Kuwait)
There are really vistual audio frequenty when ears are becoming idle for golden agers...
 finite elemente methode calculation center of mass (Germany)
 analytical + methodcenter + of + gravity (Philippines)
Obviously, Mathematics can do everything with Algebraic formalism.
The problem is that Mathematics ares approximative methods or a precise basic science? Remind that Algebraic appeared because of the Goemetric failure in resolving space.
Note that Algebraic also calculate the very complicate Relativity of "Time and Space". A pure vistual thing. In brief Algebraic calculation can only give a approximative verification of solid volume. The basic Mathematic problem is: How to rationnally prove surfaces and volumes of any solid. This a not yet resolved issue. Also is the Archimedes' Pi value that is not a rationally proved as mathematic fact, even if this Pi value is quite false but universally and religiously used for a long time in human day life.
 "haw" + km + "squere" + is + Albania (ontelecoms.gr, Greece)
 Exercice+ + déterminer + le + volume + maximal + d'un + cylindre + inscrit + dans + une + demisphère (France)
How to inscribe a maximum volume cylinder in a halfsphere? Basic data of a such problem are:
a)  A cyclinder is inscribed in a cube. They have a common vertical axis. With the side of this cube denoted as L. In a circle and in a sphere the aera and the volume of a cylinder is necessarily equal to:
L^{2}; and L^{3};
b)  Therefore, as a maximum cylinder in inscribed in a cube, The vertical section of this cyclinder is a square inscribed in the halfsphere vertical section.
Solution of haw how to inscribe a maximum cylinder volume in a halfsphere (C):
The construction is reduced to a vertical planar section (C) as shown in this next figure.
Solution
The direct solution of this construction is to use the different angles properties in a square.
Therefore, the maximum cylinder volume is placed in a halfsphere according to the immutable angle (A) of any square.
Here we have to place angle (A) from the center (O), symmetrically to the vertical axis, of the given halfcircle.
this angle intersects the circle at two points (M) and (N). These latter is the diameter of the cylinder base which has the maximum volume in the halfsphere (C).
 disposition cube sphere (fpt.vn, HCM city, Vietnam, http://shop.notjustalabel.com/)
A cube can't be inscribed in a half sphere. This figure shows the construction.
It suffices to use the homothetic of any cube particularly the circumscribed to the sphere (C). This latter side is MN and EF is the diagonal of one the cube face.
In homothetic manner with the sphere center (O) as the homothetic center the inscribed diagonal EF should be on points E' and F'. Then, the side length MN of the cube will be situated at points M' and N' on the sphere.
It can be seen that if the square of side M'N' can be insribed in the sphere circle (C) it is not the case with the cube of side M'N' and its face diagonal E'F. This cube can't be inscribed in the halfsphere of center O.
On the figure, the cube of face side diagonal E'F' but of side M'N' can't be inscribed in the halfsphere (C). On the figure the cube is seen in lateral view to undeline the diagonal length E'F'.
 is + it + possible + to + have + 3 + intersections + between + a + square + and + circle (rr.com, Carolina, USA)
It seems that squares and circles association chooses to go from two to two and avoid odd manner of twice being. Because if a square and a rectangle have only three points common with a circle, they will be a simple triangle. And a circle and a triangle is a 180 degrees while a square and a rectangle are a full 360 ones. Really, they are strange things.
 a cylinder inscribed in a cone (USA, ConnecticutMassachusettsNew York State, Hotchkiss Schools)
It is interesting to mention it.
We suppose that all these forms have their axis in vertical position. The proof need only their section along this vertical axis.
We can prove that there is a maximum cylinder volume EFGH exists in a cone one denoted as ABC. These dimensions represent directly their volume. They are triangle and square or rectangle or qadrilateral.
This next figure shows clearly the reasons of this proof.
1)  First we inscribe the cone ABC in a corresponding great cylinder.
2)  Condisering only the planar dimension of these sections, we have the following results:
The triangle aera inscribed in a square is equal to the half of this square one.
The maximum square aera inscibed in a this triangle is equal to the halfsurface of this latter.
The ratio between the aera of the triangle and the square inscribed in it is equal to 2.
For volumes we have to consider the cubes of these side dimensions.
Note
This proof is valid for any cone and cylinder having a same vertical or inclined axis, but with their base on a same plane. This canonical figure shows how to construct section of a such maximum cylinder in a cone.
Theorem
A volume of any cone is precisely inscribed between two volumes of a first cylinder where it is inscribed in and a second one of maximum cylinder that is inscribed in it. These two types of forms must have a common axis.
 if + i + leave + the + surface + area + of + cones + in + pi + cam + it + be + marked + as + incorrect (USA)
The Pi as a number is only a number that can be placed anywhere.
The Pi concerning a cone, is not concerning neither its circular base nor for its developed lateral incline aera done in a plane.
In fact the Pi appearing in any circular form is stritly a "circular space constant for transformation". It is not attached as the correspondance between a circle perimeter and its diameter. These considerations are only from the Anciants' empirism where they tempted to associated some corresponding ANALOGY between these two circle data.
 longitudinal axis of a cylinder (Spain, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia)
Naturally, these inscribed forms equalities are valid for any common axis forms and not only for straight axis in square section.
 a + cylinder + is + inscribed + in + a + cone + with + a + height + of + 10 + and + a + base + of + radius + 5. + Find + the + approximate + values + of + r + and + h + for + which + the + volume + of + the + cylinder + is + a + maximum. + Then + give + the + apporximate + maximum + volume. (sbcglobal.net, Illinois, USA)
The above figure, gives the precise solution. It is there considered aeras. However, these consisderations are valid for volumes calculations.
Let (h) the side BC and r=h/2.
Refering the volume of the cube of side BC the volume of the cone BAC of height (h) and the volume of the cube of side GH, are:
V_{(cone ABC)} = Pi/12).h^{3}
V_{(cube GHFE)} = L^{3}
Where (L) is the side (GH).
According to that:
GH = L = BC/2 = h/2
Then, the volume of the cube of side GH is:
V_{(cube GH)} = h^{3}/8
That give:
L^{3} = h^{3}/8
Finally the third root of (L^{3}) is:
L = h/2
Results:
Because the volume of the cylinder correponding to the cube where it is incribed. It is as:
V_{(cyclinder GH)} = (Pi/4).V_{(cube GH)}
Then, we can consider that the maximum of the cylinder volume is the maximum if the one of its correponding cube GHEF.
It is because a cube or a parallepipede inscribed in the cube of side BC, is maximum in volume if, all its sides are equal to BC where it is fully filling thoughout the volume of its container where it is inscribed.
Conclusion
Therefore, the maximum of the cylinder inscribed in the cone ABC of height and diameter (h), has precisely its heigh and its diameter (L) equal to:
L = h/2
Consequence:
The volume of cone ABC is equal to 8 times the one of the cone GMH, because the cube BC (4.4.4) contains eight cubes GHFE (2.2.2).
Dakhiométrie Générale formule de fonctions puissances.
Example ici de construction pour la forme du parabole
 diagram schematic de parabolas (Dominican Republic)
In Dakhiometry, movement in space can be classified in an unique spatial formula as:
Any point of motion trajectories can be rationally and precisely described by the summit of isoscele triangle. Its bases is refered by parameters defined by one of its base vertex is tangent to a fixed point. The second base vertex is refered as follow:
1)  For an ellipse, it describes a circle.
2)  For hyperbolas, it describes an arc of circle.
3)  For parabolas, it describes a straight line.
Somme of this formula illustrations are given in the following.
This has a wealthy consequences for describing the matter Condensation Process for heavenly bodies.
 tangent meter (Switzerland csfb)
 draw a circle tangent to a point on a line and another circle (Canada Saint John)
 geometry transformation and construction in a circle (New Zealand, GlobalGateway GGI2)
 how to draw a circle tangent to a line and a circle (Norway, Intility din ITavdeling)
Construction are done on following reasons:
1)  Center locus (T) of circles (Ci) tangent to a line D and to a point, or a circle C, is a parabola.
Because the general definition of a parabola is as follows: A parabola is the locus of equidistant points from a CenteredPoint (C) and a line (D). With a circle defintion as the locus of points equidistant from a center point.
2)  Inversely for a circle:
The locus of any circles (Ci) centers, tangent to a circle (C) is a circle the radius of which is equal to the sum of their two radius.
3)  Locus of centers of any given circle (Ci) tangent to a line (D) is a parallel to the line (D). It is the definition of points parallel to a line (D).
 parabola between two tangents (FraunhoferGesellshaft, Germany)
Some time it is more easyer to determine a parabola trajectory by its tangents.
 dakhiometrie (einsundeins.de, Germany)
 draw circle general tangent (Mongolia)
 circle + tangent + to + a + line + and + a + circle (China)
 circle geometry tangent easy learn (USA)
 bisector line point parabola (Italy)
 geometry circle (estpak.ee, Estonia)
Until now Geometry while knowing how to draw a circle with a compass it ignores what is a really a circle. The Geometry realm is only a linear one. It is why this lack in knowledge give rise to irrationnality, the incommensurable space Holes. In Mathematics curves are only simulated by approximative Algebraic tools. Simulation is never a precise definition method. Space is not created and can't be never described only by lines. It is the case for number theory of the Line of Reals number definitions.
Space is not obly Linear but necessarily LinearAndCircular. More exactly tell with a just order of reasons, basic space is Circular generating Linear structures.
Only with a such basic understanding, human sciences can have a more understanding on behavior of any object in space, the space on Earth and the extraterrestrial space. The Dynamics is only a primary simulation for beginning of a science. The forces is a verry narrow tool for defining movement. Only true relationships according to space structures is the authentic science knowledge of universal laws.
The following figures may appears as usual innocent ones. But really, from there can be deduced precisely the how and the why are the changes in the universe. True knowledge begings on reserach about the absolute space and sciences begin there.
 formule de mathématiques horrible (casema.nl, Netherlands)
Ce qui montre que vous avez vu que les constructions de paraboles comme ciaprès, sont si souples que l'on peut le faire dans tous les sens pour étudier un cas de mouvement donné. Alors que la Géométrie Analytique est figée raide, dans ses formalismes qui ne permet pas de s'adapter aux cas réels des études.
 geométrie pour les petit, circle (terra.cl, Chile)
 circles geometry (stteresasacademy.org, St Teresa's Academy, Kansas City, Missouri, USA)
 geometrija krog (dialup386.com, Slovania)
 tangency constructions (University of Belgrade, Bulgaria)
 "cricle" plane geometry (fpt.vn, Vietnam)
 ancient geometry circle trace (China)
 how to analyze sacred architecture with geometry (USA)
 interesting composition of rectangles and circles showing divergence from a converging point (Pakistan)
 geometrija (Croatia)
 Vietnam basketball (http://nhansuvietnam.vn, Vietnam)
 fruit de vietnam (China, culturalcatholic.com/TempTamToaChurchVietnam.jpg)
 ICI PAINT for car in Pakistan (Pakistan)
 TRISECTION CONSTRUCTION (Korea)
 Vietnam fruit (Vietnam, www.justtheplanet.com/images/writerscafe/)
 parabole + et + circle (Vietnam)
Therefore, the construction of any circle (Ci) tangent to a circle (C) and to a line (D) at point P, is given on this next figure.
Function general form:
The Algebraic formula
T=yx^{2}
can also be extended directly as
T=x^{n}
when y=x
and more generaly, when (Y) is any quantity form one usually writes it under so many algebraic number formalisms. Example given as root or exponetial forms...
However, this is here a more generalized view point through spatial figure forms. The usual geometric or algebraic parabola is nothing than a very particular understanding of a more complete spatial structure.
In Dakhiometry, a parabola is nothing else than a whole spatial complex description. For example, in spatial language, a parabola relationship can represent an aera of a square! It is a new understanding of the Potential law of matter in space. With basic understanding of matter there is an unique science of matter. There is no dichotomy between pure Ppatial Language and Physics.
Generalization
Therefore, we have there the precise general formula of spatial constructions for all power functions where are included the parabola, hyperbola and exponent forms.
All these functions rest on an unique basic second degree parabola form construction.
Note
A parabola is a form belonging to the space structure. Consequently, exponent functions are also space structure. The Algebraic forms are only imperfect and approximations understanding of space when using Numbers of conventional language.
 parabolas joke (wrdsb.on.ca, Waterloo Region District School Board, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada)
 if + friction + be + neglected + what + is + the + characteristics + of + the + motion + of + a + heavy + object + thrown + violently + downward + from + a + tall + building (Philippines)
Throwing any object is to communicate to it a speed for an uniform motion. So for this given above case it is usually written the parabolic falling motion as follows:
y = V_{0} + at^{2}
Where:
y is the object falling trajectory
V_{0}; is the initial throwing speed
a; is the instantaneous potential of the object location
t; is the duration of the trajectoty from the starting point.
This is the usual algebraic mode of analytic geometry.
But according to the Dakhiometry's spatial language, this phenomena can be easily constructed and directly measured precisely any point of this trajectory. More this spatial construction can be applied in any case of a given situation and in any scale of the figure.
Examples of this Dakhiometry language is done in this web site about the FoucaultPendulum false socalled law.
Important Notes
If you are asking for such known problem, may be it is because you want to know how is my answer about the "gravity" provide that the classical known gravity is the Newton's central force one.
The parameter (a) here, is the location potential of a system that have a Restpoint because, a Constant gravity as the (g) is false as general factor. The (g), e.g. as 9.8, is false because the Newton's Universal Gravitation is only a false empirical hypothesis.
The true universal law of space is that any celestial system is basically the space duo parameters Potential/Restpoint.
Therefore, in such system, the gravity factor denoted here as (a), should be an accelerated gravity factor of object falling motion toward the RestPoint. This is because the trajectory distance is the square root of potential energy.
Remind that the Newton's central force is inversely proprtional to the squared distance denoted as function of (1/R^{2}). So, the usual use of Earth gravity as (g=9.81) is only an approximation for cases of Earth surface objects. But this central force theory implies that the pressure in the Earth center is very high. While with the Potential/Rest there is no such contradiction. A rest point for an object means its equilibrium situation. Therefore, near the rest point there is two cases of equilibrium:
1)  Or the object has no more internal kinetic energy then it stand at Rest. All of its initial potential energy was transfered to the other surounding matter
2)  Or during the formation state of interactions, this sobject cannot lose all of its initial potential energy, then the amount of this energy is distributed as kinetic energy in such manner that this object will be orbiting aroung the Restpoint.
We have there, the shematic of the Dakhiometry matter condensation process law when stars is forming in their globe structure.
Therefore, in the case of the universal Space Potential/Rest law, the Newton's Central Force is irrelevent to describe celestial bodies as how they are formed and why a star and a galaxy systems can appear as universal orbiting systems.
It is clear that the Newton's Central Force is not only a quite simplistic but also a false model.
New simple and rational Spatial definitions and constructions of Conic
 how to construct a circle to touch another circle externally and a given point (United Arab Emirates)
You may have your own solution. Here is an another one proposed.
General Basic principle
Any spatial structure can be defined and genrerated from circle. The basic one is the squaring a circle. From there comes first the squaring an ellipse.
Example is given here for hyperbola figures with circle (Co) as line director.
You may have your own solution. Here is an another one proposed.
The construction uses the radius (R) of any given circle (C) that have to be tangent to circle (Co) and the point (P).
Note
These constructions are nice generators of hyperbola from all the locus of (C) centers. Axis (x;y) of these hyperbola are determined by the middle of tangents from (P) to the fixe circle (Co). OP is the bisector symmetrical axis of (x;y) angle. The middle of OP is the axis intersection. It is clear that axis (x;y) are limits of these hyperbola. These locus are really hyperbola because it is clear that these axis are their limits as asymptotes. While a parabola can't have any asymptote.
 using tangent to draw conic section (umanitoba.ca, University of Manitoba, Canada)
Term Conic is originated from the formalism of solid cone sections. Conics are then attached to these formalisms.
Howeve it is more wealthy to undestand that locus points of conics are locations of a particular space structure for object displacements. Then a tangent has the meaning of symmetry for the energies sources of these displacements.
 a circle and its tangent which show the properties at the point of tangency. (Carolina, USA)
Actually. From (P), it means here an asymptotic property of variables.
 como se hace un plato de parabola (Dominican Republic)
 easy + dependent + vaiable + picture (direcway.com, USA)
 hyperbola stream function (psu.edu, USA)
 hyperbola edge graph (Hong Kong)
 The Analysis of Beauty conics (comcastbusiness.net, Pennsylvania, USA)
 An Introductory Account of Certain Modern Ideas and Methods in Plane Analytical Geometry (bellsouth.net, USA)
 conic graph arts (charter.com, California, USA)
 tangents to hyperbola (adam.com.au, Australia)
 An introductory account of certain modern ideas and methods in plane analytical geometry (Australia)
 conic drawing of Apple logo (elagroup.com, ELA Group, IncPennsylvania LANDSCAPE ARCHITECS, USA)
 reciprocation of a circle to draw hyperbola (hc.edu.tw (Hsinchu City Education Department, Hisinchu City, Taiwan)
 architecture hyperbol (fpt.vn, HoChiMinh city, Vietnam)
 trisection hyperbola (Korea)
 Sydney + opera + house + hyperbolic + integration + calculus (Australia)
 hyperbolic paraboloid apply real life (Vietnam)
 hyperbole math première résolution (Ecuador)
 what is "tha" relationship between parabola and hyperbolas (USA)
On these basis of isoscele triangle, deduction can unfold more wealthy cases as liberty of large understanding about these elemental space structure for movement. What can never be known by the usual conics of the Analytic geometry.
This figure show how we can get the orthogonal axis hyperbola when tangent from point P to (Co) form a rigth angle. The whole hyperbola is generated by symmetry on the bisector axis for (Co) and P positions.
New main hyperbola characteristics are:
1)  Circle (Co) is the circular Line director. (Co) is a more precise basic parameter for hyperbola then defining it as "any hyperbola point as a constant difference between two fixe focus points"
2)  Pont (P) and (O) are the focus of each hyperbola branch. The one is the director center of the other.
3)  (T) is the tangent of any hyperbola point defined as the bisector of angle {oTp}
Conclusion
Conical belong wholy to rational and precise space structure. The consequences are of great fertility.
 how to construct a hyperbole (rr.com, so California, USA)
Practical applications using simple tangent constructions
 greatest constructions (Bulgaria)
For example, this next figure can be a collector at the focal (F), of the surrounding electromagnetic and sound energy in a solid angle. An another practical application is to use the hypebolic surface to produce dimmed headlight of cars.
 ellipse AND maths AND headlight (Sri Lanka)
 greatest constructions (alestra.net.mx, Mexico)
 How to use mathematies (Cambodia)
 solid angle satellite (Netherlands)
 real math hyperbola (bigpond.net.au, Victoria, Australia)
It is interesting to use a hyperbola surface to focus by reflexion all the electromagnetic of space in a whole solid angle. The simple spatial hyperbola defined here is useful to adjust the hyperbola parameters for construction of a choosen solid angle. It can be in 3D symmetrical to one central axis (OF).
May be, a hyperbola is more interesting to concentrate for diffusing or receiving not directional electromagnetic radius energy.
Emission of sound by a loudspeaker is there less directional and more realistic  HiFi  than as for a spherical or parabolic speaker.
 headlight hyperbola (sbcglobal.net, USA)
Note
With the squaring circle law the unit solid angle denoted as (sr) steradian, can be precisely defined as a circle of a sphere instead of refering to a square surface. On this figure the solid angle is the one with center (O) of sphere (Co).
 assimetrical speaker dispersion (rimatde.net, Spain)
 multiple hyperbolic paraboloid, architecture (tamu.edu, Texas A&M University, USA)
Possibility of conics sparial constructions is very useful for architecs. These latter are also engineer but they need artist form feeling for designing environment interaction of city and individual living. Therefore, it is more natural for them to manipulate forms from direct drawing of projects. Computer can complete at final state for producing practical dimensions of construction structures. But drawing spatial forms is the direct contact for ergonomics in conception and design between artist and engineer .
 parabolic solar cooker plans (prodinfinitum.com.mx, Mexico)
Kowing how to determine any tangent of a conics is useful for determining electromagnetic ray reflection of a given conic surface.
Using parabola for Sun rays concerns only the direct Sun ray onto the parabola surface. A parabola use only parallel Sun rays. It is more interesting to collect non parallel rays in a whole solid angle because Sun energy comes also from the whole atmosphere. Thus, an association of a central parabola with a peripheral hyperbola surfaces can be precisely determined by spatial construction for a maximal Solar energy collector. This may be for an individual solar cooker as well as for a biger installation.
Important practical notes
We are used with computer that can give any analytical conics form. It is why these present spatial constructions of conics seems to be only curious things. However, the importance of the present spatial constructions should be understood as:
1)  Spatial constructions of conics curves are rational precise and continous locus of points.
2)  The most importance of its properties is found in practice. Because spatial method allows the mastering of conics curves. For examples, a parabola or hyperbola can be defined anywhere in a given structure, between two given points. Then, it can be adjusted with factors from that we can match its curve to the given structure. In architecture, one need only a conics form to become harmoniously integrated with the other system form. In brief these spatial methods of conics can be easily manipulated with suppleness and are no more only primary forms produced by machines.
Complication and Error about Analytical Mathematics on Conic definitions
 géométrie analytique joke (Canada)
 arabolic + hyperbola + boy + scouts (Luxembourg)
May be.
The socalled Conic is from the Anciant's empirism the thinking mode is to Things and then to "analogically think" their everyday observations.
What is "conic?
One nows that Conic is originated from curiosity seen according to the different Figures of light shadowed on this cone.
Conclusion:
As light is linear then, the Conic are from Linear Figures. Whatever are the algebraic function formalism and the semingly "curves" of these conic functions,
ANY CONIC FORMALISM IS QUITE FROM LINEAR FUNCTION!
It is why Conic Function espressed by X/Y, also by X/Y/Y or more higher dimensions of lines system reference, these conic ares strictly of Linear Functions.
What is then a NOTLINEAR function?
The NotLinear function is simply the Curvilinear one.
Most of mathematicians ignore what is this curious thing as "Curvilinear Funstion"?
Therefore, I am sorry to tell them that all of the "conic" given in this present text are precisely from Curvilinear constrution ones!
Consequently:
Any of the current Conic described in the current Mathematics have to be thrown avay.
All of any functions is NECESSARY defined by CIRCLES!
Therefore, any of the current "Conic" defined by algebraic method are not the exact expression. Their utility is nothing else than to "prove the Infinity or the Nothingness ideology"
There is ONE basic universe Circular Function that shows the property of the universe Circle not as the endless Infinity/Nothingness but as the Permanence of a Circle. The Perimeter of a circle is not the infinity of Beginning and the Infinity of its Endless as was stated by Moebius. The truth is that the perimeterr of a circle is the symbol of the Permanence.
However, the perimeter is not the correct expression to express the Permanence. Because the Permanence should be described by the Isotropic property of the universe Space. Because the Circle is the characteristic of the Space Direction while the Distance is the Linear characteristic.
Mathematicians with their simplistic empirical Mathematics come up against a barrier of uncomprehension when they have to define the Angle as long as they ignore what is the difference between the Circular and the Linear space. It is why with Mathematics and their Trogonometry they will NEVER resolve the Trisection of an Angle.
Precisely, to resolve not only a trisection but to resolve the Angle Division they should at first resolve their "Circular Conic", the Conic that has no Beginning and no End but rationally and wholy constructed. Simply tell, the Dakhiometry had resolved this Universe UNIQUE Circular Conic!
It is not usefull to expressed that the Dakhiometry can defined this Unique Circular "Conic"... and then shows rationelly what is the Trisection or the divison of an Angle.
In Mathematics parabola ellipse and hyperbola are define as;
Conic as generated by A POINT AND A LINE. And written as:
M(x,y), ax^{2} + by^{2} + dx + cy + f = 0
It is a great error and a confused false definition.
Here above was seen what is a parabola and a hyperbola according to the Dakhiometry. The Analytical Mathematics for conic is proved as contradiction according to the definition of what is an asymptote.
Because if conic is generated by a focus and a line it is only an artificial process. The reason is given in the following:
Definition of an asymptote
Let a function y = f(x) (f1),
1)  (f1) has no asymptote if (x) and (y) are simultaneously unlimited quantities.
2)  (f1) has an asymptote if only (y) goes toward zero when (x) goes to unlimited quantities and inversely.
a)  A parabola is generated by a line director and a focus point or a central point. Then a parabola has no asymptote because a distance from a point to a line has no limit.
b)  A hyperbola is generated by a circle and a focus point. Then, the tangent to this circle from the focus point has a limited possibility. This limit is the condition of asymptotic situation for hyperbolic function.
c)  Perimeters of an ellipse and the one of a circle are cyclic and have no linear infinity. Therefore, generation of an ellipse is limited and has no unlimited variation and no asymptotic conditions.
Therefore, analytical Mathematics defining conic as generated by a line director and a fixe point, state that there is no possible asymptote for hyperbola. While it is valid for parabola and strangely, for ellipses.
This error is originated from Anciants studies on conic that had a partial view on parabola and in continuation for modern Mathematics. We see there that the line plus a point for conic are artificial Mathematic definition.
Conclusion
The present parabola and hyperbola exposed above in this text are really a parabola an a hyperbola precisely and rationally defined according to spatial language..
Les ellipses comme coniques
En l'espace on peut faire la moisson de joyaux que sont ses structures, lorsque l'on sait les révéler. Les structures de l'espace sont les racines par lesquelles toute lois universelles se manifeste. Une structure rationnellement definie est une lumière permettant de comprendre les milles et un phénomènes du monde.
Par exemple, une mono cellule est centrée autour d'un noyau. Que faitelle pour de multiplier? Elle dédouble son noyau, on le sait.
Ainsi, dans l'espace il existe une structure raison de base du dédoublement d'un cercle d'où apparaît la forme d'une ellipse. Ce n'est seulement par le langage de l'espace que l'on peut voir et comprendre un tel joyau de raison. Depuis des millénaires, quel mathématicien peut prétendre le voir à travers ses sciences de l'ellipse comme conique, péniblement décrite par des formules abscons et approximatives de la géométrie analytique? D'autant que les Mathématiques sont pour eux que les manifestations d'un Esprit qui n'existe pas, icibas, mais qu'ils croient que leurs corps ne sont que des pantins manipulé par lui. On peut en rire, si ce n'était qu'une mauvaise plaisanterie mais l'abrutissement de l'homme par de telle idéologie ne peut descendre plus bas. Plus con que ça, tu meurs.
Il me faut un effort pour me decider à vous révéler le conique ellipse. Lorsque je vous présente ce qu'est l'ellipse comme conique, le plus libre d'entrevous verront que les Mathématiques sont d'autant compliquées qu'elle est nulles. Il n'y a pas de Mathématiques, cette science dure. Il n'y a que des mathématiciens rigidifiés, pauvre en réflexion, prompt à imiter les perroquets et robots.
L'équation générale des coniques, cité cidessus, reconnue et adulée par tous, en milieu scolaire institutionnel, attribuée à Descartes et autres des temps contenporains, n'est que bricolage sur les conique, qui ne dit rien si c'est que plus c'est compliquée, plus les Maths sont forts. Cette tare est transmissible par contagion pour le formatage des esprits des générations et générations de scolastiques.
L'ellipse comme conique selon le langage de l'espace est d'un signification vaste et étendue, particuluèrement pour les mouvement explixitant les situaions des astres et le processus de la Condensation de la matière, selon les lois de l'espace comme Potentiel. Quelle sont ces sciences qui ne sont que toute fauses de la tête aux ongles des orteils, en math, astronomie, physique et science de la Terre?
Par expérience vécues, je sais que tout ce monde dit de science est sourd aveugle et muet du penser.
Je vous laisse, essayer de sortir de vos coniques maladroits et fausses, servant depuis des siècles à racconter des bobards sur la mécanique céleste et qui continue encore malgré les résultats que je présente en public sur Internet, depuis déjà 12 ans!
Allez, réjouissez de vos sciences infantiles et ne vous étonnez pas que le Terre souffre de sa maladie imaginaire telle que l'Effet de Serre et de son Enfer sous terre.
Au lieu des vos Pis folkloriques selon d'Archimède, faites la quadrature de l'ellipse. La Constante de l'Espace qui vous a été grâcieusement présentée, ne vous a servi à rien.
Conclusion sur les coniques
 la + solution + et + l'unicite + des + équation + de + la + forme + parabolique (United Arab Emirates)
Vous aves là, la vue d'un regard se tenant à partir du centre du problème.
En effet la racine des raisons des lois universelles est réellement le cercle comme concept logique, d'où radiusonnent les raisons d'un espace parfaitement défini de l'univers où tout n'est que solution et où il n'existe ni problème du passé ni incertitude de l'avenir. Ce n'est pas là des paroles de projections idéologiques d'homme. Ce n'est que le rationnel des Faits de l'Espace des lois universelles.
Enoncé de la Dakhiométrie: Les coniques sont pratiquement, deux sommets fixés et déterminés, d'un triangle isocèle PFH, forment un système de référence et de symétrie pour tout point de l'espace univers.
Dans le cas des figures classées comme conique, elles sont des variations d'une même raisons de base. Ses aspects ne sont pas des dispersions de similitudes que l'on a mis dans un même sac par analogie formaliste. Elles sont bien l'unicité dans sa diversité. Le voir ainsi appartient au domaine de la connaissance alors que ses applications sont des qualités de science exacte.
La figure cicontre, indique la définition pratique commune de tout conique. Elle se fait par le triangle isocèle PFH. P est un point d'une conique dont F est le focal et H un point de sa directrice. Il n'est représenté ici que la parabole et l'hyperbole. L'ellipse n'y est pas indiqué puisqu'il n'est pas encore explicité ici. Mais l'ellipse fait partie de cette définition commune.
Conséquences
Tout l'espace de l'univers, peut être décrit par la forme de conique. L'univers est un cercle et du cercle peuvent s'exprimer pour la Condensation de la matière en astres qui se fait selon la dégénérescence du cercle vers l'ellipse. Cette transformation est l'expression du Potentiel de l'Espace en énergie cinétiique. L'Astronomie est intéressée par la description des formes coniques. L'ellipse concerne la formation des systèmes astraux. Puis, en interne seulement aux systèmes astraux, peuvent s'appliquer le parabole et l'hyperbole.
La description d'une géométrie NonEuclidienne par des espace courbe n'est qu'une théorie fausse parce que née d'idéologie construite par génératio d'imageries de l'homme. Il est faux de croire que l'espace est un plan hyperbolique courbe, parce que les lois universelles ne s'exprime uniquement que dans un plan. Dans le cas de l'espace comme plans courbés, nous avons l'expression de la preuve de l'ignorance des mathématiciens et physiciens d'une ignorance de l'Espace qui n'est que leur contradiction d'un Néant. Néant dans lequel, oui selon la science officielle il y a des places dans le Néant, chacun y place où il veut Sa théorie personnelle qui l'arrange. Sacrés savants! Ceci dit, vous seriez dans le faux de conclure par là, que la Géométrie Euclidienne est la bonne. Cette dernière n'est qu'une approche lointaine de l'Espace par empirisme maladroit et que de toutes les générations de mathématiques, aucun ne sait définir rationnellement l'espace si ce n'est que par le témoignage de leurs dessins.
Voici ce que la Dakhiométrie donne.
1)  Expression de la connaissance:
Après la transformation du Cercle en carré qui est génération des Directions en Distance, la mesure de l'espace peuvent se faire par dégénérescence du cercle en expression selon les lois de coniques. La dégénérescence du cercle se fait par dissociation du point centrale, qui ne peut s'exprimer qu'en Direction, en deux points séparés marquant de la Distance.
2)  Expression de science de mesure:
Tout l'espace de l'univers peut alors se décrire à partir de deux sommets référencés d'un triangle isocèle, pout pour définir le troisième sommet dans la totalité de l'espace univers. C'est là la vraie expression des coniques.
Alors que les Mathématiques restent figées depuis des millénaires, sur quelques spécificités des formes de paraboles, d'hyperbole et d'ellipse, on peut constater la connaissance pleine de l'espace en Dakhiométrie. Ainsi, sur la figure, on peut voir que dans le triangle isocèle PFH, si l'on se réfère aux deux points F et H, on trouve dans l'espace les formes de parabole, d'hyperbole et d'ellipse, décrivant par le troisième point P. Mais que si l'on se réfère aux deux points {P, F} ou {P, H}, on trouve la formesource qui est celle d'un cercle. En variant les paramètres du triangle PFH, on peut ainsi décrire toutes les variances de point de la totalité de l'espace. C'est bien le cercle qui est la Source de toute forme de l'espace. Ceci n'est que la réciproque. Parce qu'avec l'ellipse on trouve la preuve du théorème directe où, d'un cercle, il naît une ellipse et les autres formes de base de coniques. Voilà la science vraie des lois de l'espace où il n'y a pas de dichotomie fantaisiste, un mauvais mirage entre "Mathématiques et la Physique" ou EspritMatière.
Voilà en bref, le nectar des raisons qui fait la rationnalité humaine. Il ne s'agit pas de croire ou de ne pas croire à mes exposés. Il n'est que la nécessité d'être humain.
L'inertie des savants institutionnels s'accrochant à leur besace de Trucs et Astuces de croyance, est terriblement fautive dans le reniement de la raison humaine. Leur inertie s'exerce à étouffer la Dakhiométrie, la seule et unique chance pour l'humain de devenir adulte.
 what + is + the + meanning + of + "pout" (sca.megapath.net, USA)
Sorry. "Pout" would hopes to tel for POUR or FOR. "Pout" is no more the impudent vocabulary of heretical fingers that are worying with the usual everyday inhospitable keyboard.
 loie + de + la + gravitation (Estvideo numericable, evc.net, Alsace)
C'est au féminin il faut donc mettre le mot loi au féminin.
Alors, la loi loie de la Gravitation a été l'aboutissement, d'une recherche désespérée qui avait été le tracas de toute une longue époque où l'on ne sait pas pourquoi tous les dignités tombent par terre, lorsqu'elles trébuchent.
Ayant réussit à façonner une définition du mouvement, appelé Force, Newton y prenait appui et pensait à l'association "évidente" de la masse et du mouvement. Il peut donc dire qu'il y a mouvement, lorsqu'il y a une Force. C'est ce qu'il désignait comme Vitesse ou variation de vitesse puisque lorsqu'il y a un mouvement, il y a aussi, des mouvementsdanslemouvement. C'est ce que Leibniz appelait la relativité. Justement, par la Force, Newton ne défini pas vraiment le Mouvement car la Force n'est valide que par le mouvementdumouvement, une "accélération". C'est pourquoi, en utilisant les lois de Newton, la Mécanique a un mal fou de s'acherner à définir le mouvement, prenant soin de faire des acrobaties terribles de notations formelles pour justifier l'écriture d'une force, en définissant chaque mouvement d'abord par sa référence. Sans ces précautions, la Force ne dit rien du tout sur le mouvement. C'est pourquoi, Einstein doit écrire sa formule magique:
* non pas seulement par : E=mc^{2}
* mais par: E=(mv^{2})_{i} + mc^{2}
qui veut dire que le mouvement est relatif à un mouvement initial de "je n'en sais foutre rien". Hors de la dévotion, vous constateriez que la vitesse limite obligatoire de ses photons, n'est que de la connerie attrapenigauds. C'est exactement, ce que cette formule vous dit. parce qu'il faut y ajouter une vitesse que l'on ne sait pas mesurer avec quoi? Mais voyons, avec la science de la Force de Newtion!
Il reste à "trouver une raison", ce que l'on peut dire plus justement une justification ou mieux, "se faire une raison" pour la masse. En conséquence, comme la légende de la pommequitombe le dit, elle tombe bien sur Terre et non sur la Lune. Oreu, comme la Lune est évidemment plus petite que la Terre, on peut en faireuneraison, consitant à associer la Masse comme la Source de mouvement. Dans ce cas, la Terre plus grosse que la Lune, mange donc la pomme. D'où la Loie de la Gravitation est toute "fondée" selon le témoignage massif ou unanime de tous, que la Terre et plus grasse que la Lune, d'abord parce qu'elle donne des fruits et qu'ils y pleuvaient à gogo.
C'est ainsi que se passe la plus part des recherches scientifiques, fondamentales ou appliquées. C'est vraiment l'empirisme de l'Art de Se Faire une Raison.
La preuve, La Relativité a une raison toute trouvée dans la Loie de la Gravitation Universelle de la Dynamique newtonnienne pour édifier l'édifiante théorie des Champs. Lorsque l'on est d'accord pour mettre au plus Haut, la valeur Sa Croyance Civilisatrice, qui évidemment, est toujours la plus Haute, la plus Grande, la dévotion nous tire par le bout du nez, pour "prouver" que, oui, la Masse du Soleil, dévie bien les "photons". C'est juré, craché. Vous êtes incrédule? Vous en recevrez le crachat à la figure, pour vous placer an asile, parce qu'en ces temps modernes, on n'évite de parler crûment, de la cuisson au bûcher...
Ceci dit, on ne critiquerait seulement que si l'on pouvait trouver d'autre véritable raison de la nature, pour cette pomme qui tombe toujours de son pommier.
a)  La pomme tombe parce qu'elle va se pourrir. C'est un témoignage béton. Pourtant, aucun scientifique n'en a fait une théorie... Détrompezvous. La Croyance est aussi une science qui ne porte pas la même robe. La pourriture est toute une philosophie sur le vie et la mort, son destin. Evidemment, elle n'a pas la robe que porte le BigBang et le Big Crunch, tous deux, sont issus d'un Big Trou Noir, scientifié.
b)  Il reste une chance. Celle de savoir ouvrir les yeux pour se rendre compte qu'en réalité, la science en cours, passe son temps à courir derrière son ombre. Elle jure tout le temps par l'espace mais jamais, ne se rend compte qu'elle parle d'un absent qui est de taille. Vous remarquez l'association "Absence de Taille" ou mathématiquement "la Grandeur de la quantité Zéro" ou mieux enocre, "l'Immensité ou l'Infini du Néant".
c)  Finalement et en bref, il n'y a de science rationnelle que par l'éclairage de l'Espace Matière, un Fait de l'univers si gros, que nul intelligence ne daigne regarder. L'énoncé de la loi spatiale est simple: Tout objet est défini dans l'espace par son point de repos. Cette définition se fait par le phénomène Mouvement.
La voici:
1)  Il n'y a pas de mouvement absolu de l'objet, lorsque l'objet est au point de repos.
2)  Il est en equilibreparlemouvement, lorsqu'il n'est pas en son point de repos.
3)  C'est ainsi qu'apparaît le phénomène Energy qui n'est que l'expression de l'espace comme l'Energie Potentielle
Prenez soin de lire ces définitions de la Dakhiométrie. Car, il s'agit précisément de MOUVEMENT ABSOLU.
Alors voici non pas l'explication par l'art du discours mais, la raison qui explique que si l'on tombe par terre, c'est que tout objet en surface de la Terre et à sept lieux du centre de la Terre, le point de repos commun de tout l'astre Terre... et non des objets de la Lune et d'ailleurs.
Evidemment, si l'on tombe et que la loi dit que vous êtes en équilibre... Cependant, c'est là la difficulté des sciences du Témoignage de comprendre que l'on tombe pour le plaiisr des lois et qu'il préfère accepter de subir la justice d'une poigne de fer d'une Force qui vous y oblige.
Mais, ce n'est pas ici, une autre évidence de témoignage. Une construction de la structure immuable de l'espace peut se démontrer par la transformation en énergie d'un point à une distance de son point de repos.
Je le répète encore:
Le Potentiel propriété de l'espace, définit la Mouvement absolu. C'estàdire, le mouvement en soi. C'est pourquoi, il n'y a que l'énergie de vraie, pour décrire exactement le mouvement. Voilà ce qu'avec l'habitude de déduire, on peut faire avec le fait de l'espace comme Contenant et Contenu.
Proof of rational Circle into ellipse transformation.
A most basic transformation
as physical meaning after the squaring a circle
 Integration in 3d sphere and isosceles triangle (charter.com, California, USA)
 exponential curve vs tangent curves (3Dexamples of internally tangent circles in real life, Washington, USA)
 construction in the circle (batelnet.bs, Bahamas)
 Jordan University of Science and Technology Doctors (go.com.jo, Jordan)
To complete the spatial system of the Dakhiometry's conic figure, here is the proof of the rational generation from a circle of any ellipse in space.
 how to "drown" an ellipse (as15444.net, Manchester, UK)
 how to construct ellipse my choosing points in a rectangle (USA)
Actually. It can be construted any ellipse inscribed in a given rectangle with this next construction principle. Then with the four point on the four sides middles, the circle (C) is determined to construct the seeking ellipse.
 billard + en + forme + d'ellipse, + tirer + foyer + sur + le + rebord + sur + foyer (unil.ch, Université de Lausanne, Switzerland)
La qualité des joueurs de billard est d'avoir l'esprit géomètre très aigue. On le voit se manifester à coup sûr, par les champions qui voit l'espace du billard non de manière analytique mais, cet espace dans son entier complet, où il n'y a plus de passé ni de futur. C'est ça, l'espace.
Alors, avec un billard bien au point en forme d'ellipse, je crois que les joueurs s'en régaleraient à y concevoir leurs coups magiques avec précision. Parce que l'espace d'une ellipse est très bien plus riche en relations spatiales que celles d'un rectangle.
 how do I teach ellipse by material (Turkey)
 ellipse in real life (Vietnam, http://seniorphysics.com/physics/)
 SELF PORTANT ARCHITECTURE (Mexico)
Actually.
Because universe space is pure absolute structure. Therefore, matter should be constructed according to self portant structure. It is why archtectural estetic can found construction founding on natural function logic without which geometrical forms are only coagulated sceneries.
 earth + rotation + basics (cox.net)
An ellipse is from circle family.
A star orbit or any object in space is generally composed by two energy components:
1)  A first enery type is the isopotential circle relatively to a Zero point energy of the system.
2)  A second energy type is the kynetic energy for rotation in the perfect isopotential circle around the Zero Center energy.
Both of these energy types are refered to its Zero Center constitute the universal Location factors of any object in the universe Spece.
In practice most of stars orbits are done as elleptic ones but not as a perfect circle.
It is because they are not precicely done on a given isopotential circle. It is because stars are form from the Matter Condensation Process where the energy distributions are not done by discrete manner from the initial elemental matter cloud.
Therefore a star is composed of:
E_{P} + E_{R} + E_{delta(R)}
The E_{delta(R)}, is a delta(rotation kinetic energy) is a cyclic variation of the star rotation orbit.
The effect of this later is to pulse the star in an elliptic trajectory. This latter is no more than a cyclic rotation energy done around a given average circular isopotential orbit.
The differential rotation orbit around a given average isopotential orbit is expressed in Spatial Language of the Dakhiometry as shown in this next folowing basic construction of an ellipse.
The circle (C) of this system defines the characteristic of the initial personal cloud from where the star was formed from a larger star system. For example Mattercondensation produces the Galaxy, Star series, Star systems and Planet systems.
One can note that in space everything is basicaly from a circle, not only for the Square but particularly also for the Elipse forms.
According to the circle (C) one may note that it is wrong to tell as by Kepler did it that an orbital ellipse has TWO FOCUS.
The truth is that an ellipse should be defined from a centered structure defined by a Circles (C). It is a general property from the Dakhiometry that allows to define all the ellipse spatial form properties as aera and volume of ellipsoides.
One can note on this next figure that the ellipse (MN) form is produced by two circles (C1) and (C2) rotating on the main circle (C). The two ellipse focus is only a secondary property consequuences!
 architecture turkey (Vietnam, http://nmsua.edu/tiopete/)
 architecture, jardins, ellipsesarchitecture, jardins, ellipses (Velizy, France)
Avec la possibilité de manipuler les courbes dites côniques montrées ici, on peut ajouter les formes parabolehyperboleellispse à l'architecture en générale. On peut envisager les projets de formes sur le plan du terrain et y placer les courbes voulues. Courbes qui peuvent être maniées facilement comme on le voit ici. Ensuite il suffit de les reporter en longueurs déterminées sur le terrain.
Vous aurez intoduit par là, les caractéristiques esthétiques modernes dans l'environnement urbanistique. La peinture cubiste a été bien insolite dans les moeurs des formes rectilignes et trompel'oeils. L'architecture ne doit plus servir à écrire des messages linguistiques ou des symboles d'intentions anthropomorphiques d'ambition démesurées des divinités qu'ils soient Profanes ou Divins. Elle n'en ferait plus que son enterrement en érigeant sa propre pierre tombale baroque. Nul ne veut plus la lire ni la vivre parce que l'informatique s'en charge pour tout ce qui est de discours à profusions.
L'architecture se doit d'être ce qu'elle devrait être : les justes mouvements vécus de l'homme. Ce en quoi à côté desquelles sont restés emprisonnés les architectes, fautes de moyens pratiques offerts par l'enseignement des Mathématiques. Pourquoi rester dans la ligne d'Euclide, la pyramidal symbolique, ou le cube des formes? Estce parce que l'on ne sait pas doubler un cube sans mentir? Il était temps de libérer un peu plus les formes dans le paysage de vie pour briser la rigidité des mentalités de ce monde. Monde qui voudrait avancer et qui donc est resté encore en retrait, toujours endormi dans le Linéaire des Millénaires obscurs.
L'intelligence spatiale est plus que le bond en avant de la pensée humaine. Ce serait un crime contre l'humanité que de chercher à l'étouffer et le renier par le conservatisme nombriliste des scientifiques et des responsables en cours.
Il me semble que seul l'architecture peut l'intégrer dans le vécu et avec une meilleure efficacité, dans la mentalité du monde en cours. Si l'on examine l'histoire de l'architecture moderne, quoique se tenant en arrière du discours, l'architecture urbaine a un rôle première dans l'évolution des mentalités. Pour le voir, allez dans les quartiers de styles architecturals différents de votre ville. Vous y verrez ces différences détonnantes de mentalités de leurs habitants.
Les architectes osent exprimer par la liberté de leurs oeuvres centrés sur l'être humain, là où les formes intitutionnelles anciennes dans ses virtualités, le répriment dans son conservatisme. Que nous dit le nid d'oiseau, si ce n'est que pour mener les oisillons vers leur vie? C'est pourquoi le nid d'oiseau parle de l'universel. Ainsi l'architecture se doit de s'orienter sur l'universel de l'homme et non de ses idéologies qui en sont les contraires.
 transmutation + circle (home.ne.jp, Japan)
Actually. A circle can be transmuted or transformed into different forms. For example, on the above figure case, the circle (C) can be transmuted into the line segment (yN) or any ellipse of axis (yN) or into the circle of diameter (yN). There are also other basic transformations else than these denoted figures. Only with more knowledge on the space properties and when familar to spatial constructions one can get many astonishing and deeply useful results.
The physical meaning is that le segment (yN) is the trajectory of a free falling body, the ellipse is an mixted motion resulting from rotation and falling motion components. The circle of diameter (yN) is only an homothetic motion. More natural motion form can be deduced from there.
 transmutation circle sides (iastate.edu, Iowa State University of Science and Technology, USA)
The matter condensation process is really a transmutation of Potential into kinetic energy. This figure is siggnification of its rational definition. The plane disk (C) is the surface of potential where the original elemental matter can occupy in a plane surface. The condensation process is to reduce this pure potential in reducing this surface to produce motion of a final system. This planar law happens in any space direction so that it happens in 3Dimensions.
a)  Condensing matter in the center of (C) is impossible according to many basic principles as discretness, identity, conservation of space matter,... ect.
b)  Then, only reducing matter space occupation can be done. The concerning quantity is the aera. Transforming (C) aera in energy is then transforming length dimension of (C) as the square root of aera.
c)  The perfect transformation of (C) give then a perfect another circle with the half (C) diameter. But this case is only a particular possibility in the condensation process liberty. Therefore, there is also same dimension transformations but in elliptic forms. These wealthy final condensation forms can be observed in Astronomy. The Earth orbit is precisely a just elliptic form that can generate Earth internal energy variation in such manner that complexe life can be developped and maintained.
Pure space locations transforming into kinetic energy for construction of wealthy in life can be denoted as transmutation by universal laws.
 spherical astronomy
 examples of internally tangent circles in real life (comcast.net, Minnesota, USA)
 real life internal tangent circles (fios.verizon.net, USA)
From a circle (C) and any point (F1) of any of its radius and from (C) center (F2), an isoscele triangle (F_{1}PE) defines a point (P) of an unique ellipse with diameter (MN). When (F_{1}) goes until the (C) circonference then, the figure define a pure Circle construction that is defined as follow:
A circle is generated by a isoscele triangle (F_{1}PE), the summit (P) of which is a fixed point while the side (EP) is a constant length.
 règlement de construction fully (Switzerland)
 prove ellipse (Taiwan)
Construction
a)  From any given fixed point F_{1}, draw any segment EF_{1}
b)  Draw TP, a median of EF_{1}
c)  Join E to F_{2} that intersect TP at point (P) as one of the ellipse to be formed.
Note that point (P) is the construction of the center of a circle internally tangent to (C) and to this latter internal point F1.
It is directly proved from this spatial structure of isoscele triangle that the total length from (P) to (F1) and (F2) is equal to its diameter (MN). Both are equal to the circle (C) radius as a constant length during this transformation.
Explicitly tell,
EF_{2} = radius_{C} = Constant
EP = PF_{1}; as isoscele triangle sides
Then,
PF_{1}+PF_{2} = EP+PF_{2} = EF_{2} = Constant
The altutude TP of the tiangle isoscele (F_{1}PE) are tangent to the ellipse formed. Many others of the ellipse properties are deduced from this basic spatial structure. For example, the ellipse center is defined by the line joining the middle of two sides of the isoscele triangle intersecting the diameter MN. On this figure is shown it as line (TO) where (O) is the ellipse center.
The main principle of this transformation is that the Circle can divided itself from one central center, into two separated ones. It is the case seen for an alive cell multiplication.
When this doubling of circle center happens in such manner that the isoscele triangle is exterior to the circle (C) then, the figure transformed is a hyperbola when point (F1) is a point and a parabole when point (F1) is a line.
The 3D figure for solid surfaces, are obtained when we considered e.g. the axis (y) as an axis of symmetry.
 INTERNAL TANGENTS CONSTRUCTION TO TWO CIRCLES, TECHNICAL DRAWING DIAGRAMS (Kenya)
This above five basic forms allow construction of complex composition in space. Brcause the circle is source of forms..
 "sqaureroot" + oval + inside + a + circle (rr.com, Colombus, USA)
Right! Here following is an enigma to resolved for:
The two focus center of an ellipse is not two independent indistinct things that have nothing to do each other. They have oriented meaning. The one is the Origin the other is the Birth focus. It is why an egg is born from a circle center of a hen. That is the solution of a true spatial oval egg in 2D or 3D forms!
This not a joke.
Reciprocal problems from ellipse, hyperbola and parabola
Now from any given parameters, ellipse, hyperbola and parabola, how can be found its initial generating parameters?
It is given above how from initial parameters ellipses, hyperbolas and parabolas are generated. But, in practise we meet directly any of these forms. Therefore, how can we determine their particular parameters? These are the necessary reciprocal prolems in space.
Reciprocal from conics are ignored problems in Mathematics.
The usual mathematical Geometric manners of finding tricks to get solution is no more valid. This problem need a capacity of deductive thinking needed as in Dakhiometry where all solutions are found.
So I propose to mathematicians to find solution for this reciprocal of how to find for:
a)  From any given ellipse
b)  From any given hyperbole
c)  From any given parabole
Application
For example, from a given square surface, defined as points of ellipse or of hyperbola or of parabola, how can we determine their different parameters such that all of them constitute the fullness of this given square surface? It can be extended for a 3D volume.
Note
The current science of the Universal Gravitation laws has nothing to do as Physics laws. It is quite an impotent fiction of man.
With deductive reasons as is for the Dakhiometry method, you will find through these fundamental problems, the true universal laws of Matter Condensation from where anything in the universe is constructed!
These are consequences of the basic absolute matter space knowledge.
 3 + lois + universelles + du + mouvement (Lycée JacquesCoeur, Bourges, Académie OrléansToursn France)
Vous pouvez la dire, sans être assombri par un doute.
Par exemple la formation d'une ellipse traduit pleinement, le phénomène du mouvement de gravitation, non pas celle de Newton qui n'est réellement que fiction, mais décrivant l'énergie d'un objet éloigné de son point de repos. Par exemple la Terre par rapport à son point de repos près du Soleil ou la Lune au point de repos près de la Terre ou un objet à la surface de la Terre, tombant sur le sol,... vers le centre terrien.
Remark about celestial mechanics according to difference of method
It seems that there is no difference between the Kepler's ellipse and the present Dakhiometry's one. Because an ellipse is an ellipse.
However, the difference is a fundamental capacity of deductive science relative to empirical one denoted as science of observation.
a)  Empirical method is to search from observations a likely and plausible forms in phenomena from there a formalism of mathematical model can be constructed for describing them.
b)  While in deductive mode for successive reasons it goes first to define the basic logic of the universe Facts. These latter when they are justly and steady defined, are used as root reasons for deduction of their consequences.
It is for example the case of the ellipse generation shown above where from a complete Matter Space definition, a rational science can define the reality of a space structure from there a phenomenon can't but be defined as such. Here observations and experimentations are only simple verifications as belonging to this defined structure.
This latter is what is known as the science goes from general view to reveal the particular. It is the contrary of the usual science empirical method that tempts from consequences to state a law.
Un joyau, une merveille de la structure de l'espace
 joining of ellipse form with rectangle (Bangladesh)
You are right to underline such construction. It is the case when we do the squaring an ellipse.
Je profite pour signaler que cette construction de l'ellipse indiqué sur la figure cidessus, est une lumière fantastique sur le commencement de l'univers et le commencement de la vie.
Evidemment, enfoncé comme vous êtes tous par la vieille Mathématique, croyant tout savoir parce que vous avez une panoplie de fonctions analytiques de conique, le tout renforcé par les calculs d'ordinateur puissants pour faire conquête de l'espace. Ecrasés encore plus par la croyance à vos hautes civilisations highTech et vous grosses têtes de Physiciens et Mathématiciens, vous n'avez cependant nullement la capacité de la pensée déductive et aucune connaissance de l'espace. Comment pouvez vous voir dans la construction que je propose pour l'ellipse, une quelconque richesse de vue sur les lois universelles que cette structure présente comme portail de la connaissance rationnelle.
Vous n'y verrez que des trucs et astuces pour en conserver quelques recettes et en faire une conquête des Mathématiques. Ce serait une injure à la raison et une malhonêteté intellectuelle que de vouloir soumettre la Dakhiométrie au carcan de la science empirique des Maths.
Je vous signale donc à tout hasard,
Que la construction de l'ellipse qui vous est exposée ici, est une vue du joyau aux mille éclats, à l'ampleur de la connaissance de l'espace.
En ce portail, les outres bien pleines ne passent pas. Vous pouvez y aligner tous vos savants possibles, les uns après les autres. Nul n'est capable d'y entrer, depuis des millénaires.
Moralité
Il est temps que je mets les points sur les "i".
Voici quelques commentaires sur cette structure de l'espace Mère du Monde. Ce n'est pas ici, de la rhétorique, du barratin idéologique, du lyrisme de celui qui se pâme dans ses croyance. Ce n'est que de pures raisons, encore fautil que chacun saitil ce que pourrait être la raison. Et il est grave d'y voir que c'est une théorie ou un dogme de Croyance farfelue comme toute autre. Ce que je dis ici, se démontre rationnellemnt par la déduction de raison, comme tout ce qui est démontrée en Dakhiométrie selon la Connaissance de l'espace matière universel.
1)  Chacun croit que c'est évident mais, cette structure peut décrire rationnellement et précisément la formation des astres.
2)  L'ellipse n'a pas deux foyers interchangeables que l'on ne sait que faire de l'un ou de l'autre. L'ellipse a deux centres dont l'un est l'Origine et l'autre la Naissance. Les deux a des fonctions complémentaires de Création ou de Construction des lois de la matière.
3)  Cette structure de l'espace exprime la structure des lois mêmes de l'univers, dans ses manifestations de construction.
a)  Elle éclaire le mécanisme du développement complexe du vivant comme multiplication en cellules. Une étude plus complète peut y révéler l'histoire de la formation de la matière atomique.
b)  Aussi incoyable que cela paraît aux esprits de robot, cette configuration de l'espace, exprime clairement que l'ŒUF et la POULE est Un.
Ces remarques vous semblent de la fiction. Mais vous pouvez être sûr qu'aucune imagination fantaisiste que l'on prête jusqu'à maintenant sur les extraterrestres, n'arrive à la cheville de telles réalités rationnelles.
Ne vous leurez pas.
Vous ne connaîtriez jamais de telles vérités. Sachez que j'ai 70 ans sur cette Terre, parmis des "scientifiques" soildement institutionnalisés. Depuis tout ce temps, ces cerveauxgris perdent le temps précieux à ne voir en moi que comme "plus con que lui, tu meurs". Dicton: Quand on marche la tête en bas, on ne peut savoir ce qu'est le monde à l'envers. C'est un fait et non quelques humeurs d'insatisfait de profane. Ceci vous montre que l'esprit des humains civilisés stagne au fin fond de leurs Labyrinthes Enfernals.
C'est sûr. L'homme a perdu sa seule chance UNIQUE d'être humain.
Loi du Comptage de la Dakhiomètrie
 la + somme + des + angles + d'un + triangle + est + égale + a + 180° + estelle + absolue? (Algeria)
C'est très fondamentalle comme interrogation.
Voici un énoncé de Fait:
Toutes les Directions de l'espace sont ABSOLUES.
La raison est dérivée du Principe de Succession:
Toute quantité succédante ou précédente d'une autre quantité est une quantité définie c'estàdire absolue.
Ainsi, la matière de l'univers est discrète. Elle est donc absolue puisque étant finie, la matière est toujours succédante et précédante d'une autre quantité. Ceci ne s'applique pas à l'idéologie de l'Infini car, l'infini n'est pas une quantité.
Particulièrement, le point d'un cercle est toujours succédant et précédant d'un autre point. Aussi, tout angle d'un cercle est une quantité absolue. Le triangle n'est que trois points d'un cercle avec ses angles et rien d'autre.
En déduction
Si l'homme sait compter, ce n'est pas parce qu'il y a des Nombres comme modèle de l'univers. Il sait compter parce que la matière est Quantité selon le Principe de Succession. Si la matière est accessible par la quanrité, nous en déduisons que l'Espace matière est aussi Quantité, selon la quantité de succession de localisations. Il y a donc quantité de matière dans la quantité de localisation. Couramment, on le désigne par Masse en un Centre dans l'espace. C'est pourquoi, Etant quantité, l'espace est ABSOLU.
Ce qui implique que le Mouvement est Absolu.
Seul l'ignorance de la physique de l'espace, engendre l'idée de la Relativité du mouvement.
 evolution + fundamental + laws + of + nature (Spain)
Logic of dicrete matter and space as Potential Energy imply that Motion is necessarily ABSOLUTE. It is why the Dybamic definition of motion with a Force is inconsistent because a Force law is a Relativity expression according to that an acceleration is always a relativity concept. Relativity means that motion can be measured only as motioninbackgroundofmotion. Relativity is generated from ignorance of space reality where this latter is a contradictory concept of Infinity in Nothingness. Nothingness is nothingness particularly it has no dimension as for Mathematics, infinity is a dimension.
Preuves expérimantales du Mouvement Absolu
A vous chacun qui est encore libre d'esprit
Je me rends compte que si je dis que le Mouvement est Absolu, vous êtes baba mais aussi, lorsque vous y retrouvez la raison, vous êtes aussi baba de constater que les théories des Savants Scientifiques et Philosophiques, sur la Relativité sont autant ignare sur le Mouvement. La Flèche de Zénon est une preuve de l'incompréhension épaisse du Mouvement Absolu. Le Mouvement qui étaient leur tracas le long des sciècles de temps perdu et gaspillé pour la construction de la vie.
Voici des exemples concrets et incontestables sur le Mouvement Absolu.
Ce qui est absolu est saisissable.
Ainsi, chacun peut prendre tout objet dans sa main. Il peut le saisir, simplement parce que l'objet dans l'univers est ABSOLU. La raison d'où découle sa propriété de l'absolu vient du Principe d'Unicité dans l'univers Discret. Seul le Discret est muni de la propriété d'être saisissable par l'esprit de conscience et par les sens de chacun.
Appliquons ces propriétés au mouvement.
Qui a déjà vu du mouvement sans objet? A moins de cauchemar, personne ne peut voir, mesurer, comprendre, un mouvement comme un objet en Soi.
Ce qui signifie que le mouvement est un phénomène de la matière objet. Il en est ainsi, de la lumière qui n'est que les manifestations de la matière en particulier.
Comme tout objet est une matière absolue, il en vient directement que son mouvement est nécessairement absolu.
Preuves expérimentales
a)  Il n'y a pas de Mouvement sans la présence d'objet matériel. On ne peut jamais prétendre attraper un Mouvement. Attraper signifie aussi Mesurer.
b)  Etant une propriété de l'objet, le mouvement est absolu. Ce qui signifie que l'on peut attrapper et mesurer le mouvement, en absolu. Il suffit d'attrapper l'objet en question!
Jusqu'à ces lignes, vous êtes encore baba sur l'absolu du mouvement. Mais, avec l'esprit moins formatté par les Savants des Institutions Scientifiques, vous vous rendiez compte peutêtre que, EFFECTIVEMENT, on attrappe toujours le mouvement, dans la vie de tous les jours!
Exemples:
1)  Quand vous portez un litre d'essence dans un bidon,
n'estce pas là le bidon, un moyen pour vous d'attrapper le mouvement?
2)  Quand vous coincez l'eau dans une vallée, derrière la prison des barrages hydrolyques,
n'estce pas là, le moyen d'attrapper le Mouvement?
3)  Quand vous vous donnez un mal fou de produire et conserver des atomes de matière avec lesquelles, vous en tirez de l'énergie nucléaire,
n'estce pas là, le moyen d'attrapper le Mouvement, même rebelle?
4)  Quand l'on reçoit une baffe sur la figure,
n'estce pas là, une occasion de ne pas vouloir attrapper le Mouvement?
5)  Quand un athlète apprend à courir vite,
N'est pas là par le moyen de son corps, pour qu'il crée Son Mouvement Absolu, rien qu'à lui, perdant ou gagnant?
6)  Quand, sur le sol on trébuche et tombe et que l'on grimace de douleur,
n'estce pas là, le souhait de ne pas attrapper le Mouvement?
7)  Si vous ne pouviez pas résister aux cyclones,
n'estce pas là que le Mouvement n'est pas Relatif? Parce qu'avec cette relativité, on peut tuer les mouvements du cyclone, comme deux trains roulant de concert à la même vitesse, peuvent annuler leurs mouvements relatifs.
8)  Pourquoi, les bateaux ne peuvent jamais être en totale sécurité sur la mer agitée?
N'estce pas là, pour la même raison, que le bateau reçoit le Mouvement Absolu de la mer et ne peut pas y échapper par quelle méthode de mouvement relativiste.
9)  Quand on a rien de toutes les avantages précédentes,
N'estce pas là, l'absence de Mouvement, la NonExisrence, la complétude de la Mort?
Alors,
Ajoutez [M.(v_{inconnue})^{2}] dans la formule Relativiste d'Einstein,
E = [M.(v_{inconnue})^{2}] + M.c^{2}
Vous aurez incontestablement, la Mort dans l'Ignorance.
Voilà pour vous tous qui a encore quelque lumière de raison en soimême, ce que veut dire concrètement: LE MOUVEMENT ABSOLU.
En conclusion:
Relisez ce texte en toute modestie.
Faites ce qui vous plaira, mais n'imitez pas par dévotion, l'Ignorance des vieilles Sciences de la Croyance de l'homme, qui ne sont capables que de fabriquer des moyens de Destructions de l'homme et de la Terre.
Du Principe d'Unicité des lois de la matière, l'univers est ABSOLU en toutes ses manifestations.
 mécanique rationnelle
Notez la différence immense, entre la Relativité et L'Absolu de l'espace.
 what + caused + motion + in + the + universe (wlfrct.sbcglobal.net, USA)
Actually. This a pertinent issue. "What is generating motion" mation is the basic more enlightening question while "what describe a motion" is only a practical one. This latter is the case of defining Force while the first is a fundamental Physics question.
 step + by + step + tp + construct + a + perpendicular + bisector + of + a + segment (USA)
 Euclid's second theorem practice (bellsouth.net, USA)
 Einstein + la + matière + est + une + organisation (France)
On a fait un livre sur les proverbes d'Einstein comme cette expression en est une.
N'y voiton pas que c'est une expression de langue de bois?
Une expression qui ne dit ni oui ni non. Ce n'est donc pas une pensée scientifique. Surtout que la matuère de sa Relativité, est un véritable bordel dans l'univers où Temps et Espace se tordent et se crêpent les cheveux à qui mieux mieux. Comment oseton rappeler que la matière est organisation ans un monde où l'on doit douter de ses formes? Un monde de relativité où une Vitesse Constante (c), est toujours constante, même relativement à tout autre vitesse!
Dire que l'on m'apprenait qu'il suffit d'une seule contradiction pour affirmer que l'on est dans le Faux!
Un mot sur les Coniqueries
Il n'y a pas d'intention de ma part de sentiment de mépris pour qui que ce soit. De toute manière, mépriser l'Ignorance n'est pas mépriser l'homme. J'utilise des expressions de langage seulement pour tenter de secouer les uns et les autres de la léthargie qui fige le monde.
Maintenant que j'ai parlé des philosopheries de l'homme sur l'Absolu et le Relatif, on peut peutêtre songer à la philosophie consistant en l'intérêt pour ce qui fait que l'homme vit.
L'appréhension du monde autour de soi selon la Relativité n'est pas récente comme inventé par un génie de science moderne. La Relativité est un défaut d'ignorance qui s'accroche à l'homme depuis des millénaires pour en faire un croyant béton. Quel est ce défaut d'ignorance qui transparaît en l'homme comme celui portant des lunettes Relativiste? C'est l'ignorance de l'universel du monde, la vérité, l'absolu du monde, en bref ignorer que le monde est un Principe d'unicité, malgré le génie humain d'inventer le mot Univers. L'univers vient de l'intuition que l'homme a de l'Unicité. Le Soi, la Vérité, l'univers sont entre autes, les présences de la permanence et l'immuable du Un qui est l'Ubiquité de l'Unicité. Ce dernier n'est que l'élément ultime de logique du monde particulièrement, l'élément du Penser humain. Sa présence est si partout à la fois que l'homme ne le voit pas.
Or l'homme est un malin, intelligent astucieux, le roi du "système D". (D) comme Démerdeur, Débrouillard.
Alors, l'homme n'est pas une bête pensante. Il est effectivement une bête, mais une "bête qui Sait tout". Il sait donc la monde par son système (D) de la Relativité. Rassurezvous, l'homme qui voyage à la vitesse de la lumière et qui rajeunit, n'est rien par rapport à la nature Relativiste de l'Ignorance de l'homme.
L'homme Relativiste ignore par:
 Le Témoignage
 L'Association
 Par Trucs, Astuces et Recettes.
Vous allez dire "mais il ignore donc tout"? Il faut une sacrée claivoyance pour faire cette remarque. Car celui qui SAIT TOUT, est celui qui ne sait vraiment rien.
Cette mise en scène d'introduction, me permet de vous faire entrer dans le monde de la CONIQUERIE. Je vous précise que Coniquerie n'a pas pour éthymologie CON et Conneries.
Il s'agit ici de vous montrer ce qu'est le procédé de témoignage conférée par la pleine croyance inculquant le tic chez l'homme de voir tout en Relativité.
La Coniquerie est la fameuse vision des mathématiciens de voir des formes curieuses, grâce aux Témoignages ou aux Observations et par associations de quoi, on a fait une science de Coniquerie.
Par débrouillardise l'homme finit par s'appercevoir et remarquer un jour, que son chapeau est un Cône comme l'entonnoir de sa cuisine ou de sa boîte à pharmacie. À force de l'admirer nuit et jour, ils finissent par y distinguer les formes que l'ombre peut créer sur ce cône. Débrouillard et Démerdeur, mais laborieux, il finit par énoncer des lois de ces formes qu'ils dénomment comme des Coniques en mémoire de la forme de cône de son chapeau. Vous savez qu'il y a qui en fait une sculpture sur son tombeau...
En conséquence, je viens de vous introduire dans la fameuse science des Coniqueries constituant les mille manière d'un cône de recevoir la lumière. Même si ces coniqueries permet aux génies de parler de leur mécanique céleste, ce n'est rien d'autre qu'une science des formalismes de formes Témoignées par un Cône.
Certain d'entrevous auriaient la réaction en protestant que :
"Critiquer, critiquer, c'est bien. Mais, que saiton d'autre?"
Alors, si la Relativité est Fausse comme étant la créature de l'Ignorance, il existerait donc le Juste ou le Vrai ou le Réel de ces phénomènes de formes.
En effet, le Réel est l'Absolu du monde et de tout ce qui est dans ce monde. Par exemple si l'on est convaincu qu'il y a le Soi, même sans jamais savoir ce qu'est le Soi, c'est que le Soi veut dire l'Absolu d'une certaine Réalité.
Alors, je vais vous faire ici, la danse de l'Absolu dans ces phénomènes classés sous le chapeau de côniquerie.
a)  L'espace matière est absolu, sans quoi il n'y a pas d'univers de ces astres dans le ciel. L'espace est absolu tel que les chose peuvent y être, sans quoi, personne ne peut savoir s'il y a le Nord, le Sud, l'Est et l'Ouest ni non plus qu'elleest, son icietmaintenant.
b)  Or si l'espace absolu est tel qu'il est pour chacun et pour tous à la fois, il y a néanmoins des personnes qui ne reste pas en place. Chacun voit le monde dans ses Mouvements. Tout se déplace aussi.
c)  Comment peuton décrire l'espace qui Est et l'espace qui se déplace en mouvement? Si l'on prend les obejts qui bougent comme témoin de mouvement, on se soumet nécessairement à la relativité des uns aux autres. Or si l'on ne pense au Mouvement, que seulement comme un rapport des uns aux autres, c'est que l'on IGNORE que l'espace est absolu et qu'il faut le décrire autrement que par le FIGÉ! Par exemple comme Newton et tous les Savants scientifiques, sans exception, qui n'ont que des notions relatives.
d)  Un effort pour accéder à l'idée que l'espace est fixe dans l'absolu, mais que l'espace est aussi à la fois le Contenant et le Contenu. Ce qui veut dire que le Mouvement est contenu par l'espace ou que l'espace est Mouvement. L'espace matière est donc à la fois le Lieu et à la fois le Déplacement du Mouvement
e)  La loi de l'espace univers où tout se construit sans cesse où il n'y a de Permanence que le Changement, se lit, pour ceux qui le peuvent. La loi de l'espace univers se lit directement dans l'espace, par le langage de l'espace.
Faisons cette lecture qui doit indiquer nécessairement et le Lieu et les localisations de Mouvement
1)  Déplacement en cercle
a) Le lieu se réfère à 1 point fixe F1 et un point d'un cercle de centre F2.
b) Les localisations dans l'univers de ce déplacement, est indiqué par le sommet d'un triangle isocèle intérieur au cercle F2, dont (F1F2) est la base.
2)  Déplacement en un autre type de courbe (ellipse)
a) Le lieu se réfère à 1 point fixe F1 et un cercle de centre F2.
b) Les points de localisation du mouvement sont indiqués par le sommet d'un triangle isocèle intérieur au cercle (F2) dont un sommet de la base se trouve sur le point F1 et le côté de l'autre passe par le centre F2 du cercle.
3)  Déplacement en ligne droite
a) Le lieu se réfère à 2 points fixes F1 et F2. F1 et F2 peuvent être deux cercles égaux.
b) Les localisations dans l'univers de ce déplacement, est indiqué par le sommet d'un triangle isocèle dont (F1F2) est la base.
4)  Déplacement en courbe (hyperbole)
a) Le lieu se réfère à 1 point fixe F1 et un cercle de centre F2.
b) Les points de localisation du mouvement sont indiqués par le sommet d'un triangle isocèle dont un sommet de la base se trouve sur le point F1 et le côté de l'autre passe par le centre F2 du cercle.
5)  Déplacement en un autre type de courbe (parabole)
a) Le lieu se réfère à 1 point fixe F1 et une droite D.
b) Les points de localisation du mouvement sont indiqués par le sommet d'un triangle isocèle dont les côtés sont pour l'un perpendiculaire à (D) et l'autre passe par le centre F2 du cercle. Ici, le cercle F2 peut être de rayon nul.
 the general meaning of space (otenet.gr, Greece)
 Aristotle + on + falling + objects + animation.gif (bti.net.ph, Philippines)
When he tell that any object goes toward its rest point, he didn't know that he had an absolute space concept. However he was right.
 laws + of + motion + animation.gif (bti.net.ph, Philippines)
 comment + faire + la + transformation + geometric + rotation + avec + un + compas (Canada)
Ce qui permet de définir ce qu'est un compas.
Un compas est un triangle isocèle. Il est un segment de droite (la base du triangle) ou les 2 côtés du triangle isocèle. Un compas n'est pas un cercle. Il ne peut créer un cercle. Mais le compas ne fait que reproduire un cercle. Lequel? il reproduit le cercle que fait la main du dessinateur, tenant le sommet du triangle.
Il n'y a aucun instrument réalisable qui puisse créer un cercle parce que le cercle est une forme virtuelle, dans le sens d'innaccessible. Elle est permanente et immuable en toute chose. Mais elle est particulièrement dans la main et du pensée de l'homme qui le trace. C'est pourquoi, construire une forme avec "le Compas et la Règle", ne veut dire réellement qu'une tautologie comme "construire avec le Segment et la Règle".
Le cercle est une forme transcendentale. Elle est la Forme Mère de tout autre forme.
Appliquer cet énoncé à la lettre est le seul cas qui veut dire: ne pas être un perroquet mais plutôt être en conformité à la loi universelle. Appliquez le comme concept en arrière fond, en soutien de tout problème et vous verrez que des chemins s'ouvent, qui conduiraient souvent aux trésors.
Les schémas cidessous, permettent de construire des instruments macaniques de traçages de formes ou de courbes paramétrées. Ce que les fonctions analytiques n'en disent pas grand chose.
 fundamental symmetry principles (imsa.edu, Illinois Mathematics and Science Accademy, Aurora, USA)
 fundamental symmetry of the universe (United Arab Emirates)
Basic property of matter is the symmetry. The cercle central symmetry is the ultimate rest state of matter. That is to tell that at this ultimate state, there is ONLY the central symmetry logic as the unique universe knowledge, and nothing else. Therefore, the symmetry is inherent to space structure. This the permanent basic of any universal law and of human deduction process of fertile thinking.
 machanical advantage (surewest, USA)
 parabolic transformation formulas to create art (sentex.ca, Canada)
The following spatial formulas can be easily done in practice of Arts. For architectural drawing it can be realized with mechanic systems. There are not only compass and rules for many practical uses.
Also, algorithms for computer can produce these different line forms, in absolute situation without axis referent bothers of analytical geometry calculations. This concerns 2D and 3D mode.
 what + is + a + defintion + of + a + straightsegment + on + a + graph (charter.com, Tennessee, USA)
a)  A linear successive locations.
b)  A movement of material point according to its equidistance from two different refering points.
 A + ClosedForm + Solution + to + the + Problem + of + Optimal + ToolPath + Generation + for + Sculptured + Surface + Machining + on + MultiAxis+NC + Machine (telecomitalia.it, Iraly)
It may concern also robot movements where too much freedom axis cannot be easily resolved by complicated analytical linear calculations.
 Parabola math how to do it (sbcglobal.net, USA)
Here is a Dakhiometry new space consept that, may be, is yet difficult to conceive for mathematicians and physicians:
What we see as Movement in space is only simple forms and complex form structures of a material system. This is the space property consequence where form is potential energy. Therefore we should see heavenly bodies systems as fixe forms and not as random movements according to some virtual Universal Gravity. This form can be transformed under any interaction. Hyperbola and parabola are also fixe forms that don't go to "infinity". They are limited by the system energy.
 ilustration + of + motion + and + curvilines (USA)
Actually, here is how to construct real continous curvilinear lines.
 algebra hyperbola (fios.verizon.net, USA)
Algebaic calculation and all the analytical formula are necessarily dicontinous values of pararbola curve.
 The Key to Universal Movement (wanadoo.fr, ClermontFerrand, France)
Even these descriptions of movements are defined by space structures, its is however the basic of movement realities because placements of any object is directly defined by the ansolute space structure. Changes of object trajectories are only due to mutual interactions between them. More generally and precisely tell, changes of trajectory are interaction positioning in spatial structre for any system.
There is no uniform straight line motion according to the space Potential where movement are necessarily change of position the phenomenon of which depends to the space location energy.
 Uniqueness + vs. + universal + characteristics + fundamental (Massachusetts, USA)
 Coriolis force demonstration (eds.com, HewlettPackerd, USA)
The Coriolis force is born from pure imaginary.
It is false because of contradiction to mechanical basic principle that is stated as follows:
Segregation necessary happens between two simple material systems with different energies
This comes from the basic principle of matter Uniqueness where energy can define them distintively. Examples:
a)  A meteorite can never hit the Earth if these two systems is not different in energies.
b)  It is difficult to jump in or out of a running train if this latter is displacing rapidly. The energy difference is too high.
c)  Why a rider falls as soon as the horse is suddenly stopping? Because the movement energy of the rider is more greater than the horse one.
d)  Why a bullet can be launched from a catapult? Because the catapult beam is suddenly a zero energy while the bullet is moving.
e)  Why an information bit on a computer Hard Disk remains always at the same location on this disk? It is because this information bit fixly defined on the whole hard Disk structure. More generaly tell, the hard Disk information is internal to the whole material disk sytem.
The Coriolis force is supposed that the Earth is action on any object on its surface. This means that any object on the Earth surface is distinctively an independent one. Consequently, the atmosphere and the oceans are continually under strain and pressure due to the Earth rotation. Under such condition of gaing energy from the Earth as it is rotating during all the time toward East then, the atmosphere and the ocean water should necessary rotating towards the West. This whole oposite motions will necessary end a futur day since some billions of the Earth existence. May this equilbrium happens or not?
1)  If The equilibrium is not a dead end of these Earth movement then, it means that the Earth is a continual energy source. Being a perpetual energy source then there is a contradiction to the Energy Conservation prinicple. Therefore, the Coriolos Force is a false theory that ignore any basic mechanical principle.
2)  If there is the equillibrium of the two opposite motions on the Earth, then, there is no more any CoriolisForce on Earth. Therefore, the Coriolis Force is also a false theory that states possibility of mechanical law disappearance in the Nothingness.
Conclusion
The Coriolis Force is only a mirage due to impossibility of the Dynamics to define movement phenomenon.
Now there is an another explaination from the Dakhiometry that classes the Coriolis Force in mirage type.
We have above an example of a computer hard Disk seen as an absolute permanent space structure where any information bit can be placed practcally as immutable structure.
Now, in Dakhiometry it can be precisely defined the matter condensation process to form any heavenly body. There is no Newton's Universal Masses Gravitation. But the matter condensation process is done according to placement of elemental matter according to ther potential energy. The potential energy characterized the absolute space location around a rest point.
It can be compared to an information bit thare can be placed in a Hard Disk. We know that a Hard Disk is logically placement of memory. It is the case for elemental matter that are progressively placed around a rest point. From the Zero Potential of a Rest point, it can be placed discrete matter successively as function of each energy.
For example, it is supposed that elemental energy quantities are denoted as (1, 2, 3,..., n). Then, from a cloud of matter that will be condensed towards the Rest point, it can be logically place successively only a layer of energy quantity (1), then when there is no more the quantity (1), it can be placed any quantuty (2), succesively the condensation process do a such exhaustion of all the elemental matter coming from their initial cloud. Any heavenly body are built by a such logical placement of potential energy. From such meticulous process any heavenly body can appear as a nice spherical sphere.
In such universal mechanical law any heavenly body is ONE UNIQUE WHOLE SYSTEM. As a Hard Disk, where no information bit can be mechanical read without loosing any memory information, any object in the Earth belong to internal system. And in rotation as any information bit on Hard Disk can not be displaced, it is the same for the Earth system where the Earth rotation cannot affect energy of any internal object on its surface. The Coriolis force is therefore only the imperfect Dynamic theory producing mirages.
Note that if between two objects on the Earth can experience mutual interaction, it is however impossible for any whole system to produce a change in his internal energy. This is only the consequences of the Energy and the Momentum conservation principles.
The CoriolisForce and the FoucaultPendulum are contradictories to these basic principles.
 Coriolis+force + bug + on + wheel + concentric (Michigan, USA)
The Dynamics is separated in two parts as the Kinematics and the Dynamics ones. The Kinematics is no more than the Geometry. It is a serious error when tempting to make kninematic or geometric descriptions as the Dynamics ones. Because Geometric figures can't never be described with the Dynamic Force formula. This error on foundation was done by Coriolis when he was confused in Geometry with Kinematics.
 the five basic life functions (sulanet.net, Honduras)
It is really such.
Because movement are phenomena of matter interactions. Universe interactions are energy exchanges not for destruction but always for construction. For exemple, from these five basic movement functions it can be deduces the oval form of an egg. The spatial construction of an ovale has nearly a structure like the yolk in a bird egg.
Note
With the spatial language and according to the Absolute Space, orbits of heavenly body, is not observed relatively from the Earth as an ellipse form. Precisely any observation of heavenly bodies relatively from the Earth, should be as a perfect oval form. Far from the Earth this oval form can be confused approximatly with a circle. But near to the Earth as the Moon does, the orbit of this latter should appears in measurement as a pefect oval a little streched in its longest axis.
 relative motion (USA)
The one basic, the fundamental data between an observer and observed is the Distance between these two points of view. It is done when an animal is running to catch its prey. No matter what are their trajectory for each of them, it is the instanteneous true relative distance between them.
Thus, between two heavenly bodies that are in motions, the first data of measurement is concerned by the distance length between these two bodies. What are their true orbits are ignored at first by the observer but are only the consequence of some observation results.
It is why the first scientific job of an astronomer is to determine the real distances at any points of their different orbit motion. Thus when Kepler state that the planets observed through telescope are elliptic orbit, it was only a theorical illusion. He should at first only determined the distanceorbit between two particular planets. Then theorically concluded that they may be orbiting around the Sun according to deduction from the observed relative distanceorbit from the Earth.
Such steps of observation is the true one. There is no other possibility else than pure imaginary theorical prejudice method.
Therefore, the first scientific process is to determine heavenly bodies orbits relativeley to the Earth observer that may be shematically shown in the following figure.
 Relative motion (United Arab Emirates)
Note the difference between these figures from the empirical reltivity of observations process that furnishe until now all the science theories, e.g. the Newton Force.
The relative heavenly bodies orbits are denoted as relative but is not the mirages from relativity concept. These relative orbit are rather the absolute considerations of measurements. Because the measurements of distance between an observer and a given object are a true absolute length recording. Obviously space is both distance and direction, therefore, a distance plus a direction furnishe a trajectory description as orbit. This is necessary the real measurement condition. Because an observer from the Earth can never practically see directly Jupiter orbiting around the Sun. The Jupiter elliptic orbit is only a theorical consequence from practical observations.
 examples of absolute and relative motion (Mlaysia, psycnet.apa.org)
This next figure show the relative motion that contradic the Coriolis Force.
Observation point (M) in rotation around point (O), should see a point (P1) and (P2) according to relative trajectories (T1) and (T2) as in oval forms.
a)  (P1) is independnent to the rotation sytem but is absolutly fixe.
b)  (P2) is also independnent to the rotation system, but it is mouving in a linear and uniform motion. It relative trajectory from (M) is also a nearly oval form but not as a circle or an ellipse.
Note
An artificial satellite with circular orbit around the Earth is only an absolute one. But relativeley to an observer standing on the Earth surface, the true observed orbit of this satellite is as shown in this next figure. This latter shows the relative orbit of a stallite at 1000 km altitude seen from a signal collector fixed on Earth. The reality of hevanly orbits are Absolute ones and prove that tne space is absolute. It is why the Einstein Relativities contradict the universe reality.
Relatively from a fixed point on the Earth surface, any artificial satellite should have rather an oval form!
This relative trajectory is not a virtual one calculated from an analytical algebraic function as it is done with the Coriolis force. From spatial construction the relative locations are real defined data. In such case of relativity, this shows that the Coriolis force is a bad artificial theory.
The trajectory shown here is only the basic general form. According to the velocity of any object launched from the Earth, its relative motion "discribes" the same form according to a particular homothetic one. So, until now some weird thing, particularly about gravitationnal interpretation, from observations on satellites, probes and planets trajectories come from systematic error when using the Newton's, Einstein's and the Coriolis' inconsitent and false theories.
 physics gif animation relative movement (Serbia)
 translation + and + rotation + superposition (Germany)
Yes it is exactly the case.
It concerns not the Dynamics but only by the Cinematics. It is an error that contradics the theory and complicates the formalism when Coriolis introduced there a Force. This latter states a false physic concept that between two independnent objects, there is an interaction Force. We get there the contradiction to the First Newton Law. Even if the Universal Gravitation is a curious oddly exceptional Law that has a privilege to contradic the First Newton law.
All this show that the Newton's Law are incoherent and fondamentally unvalid. It is terrifying that science of man is so blind and thus very adaptable to contradiction!
 the + observed + motion + of + an + object + not + only + depends + on + the + position + of + the + object + but + on + the + position + of + the (comcast.net, Michigan, USA)
Yes the two motions should be composed in the total relative one.
Yes the two motions should be composed in the total relative one.
It is why when we mesure only the distance between the observer from the observed object while donot know the observer motion, the result will be a virtual one.
Unhappily, it is the case for all the measures done in Astronomy!
The Force that is a Relativity view point theory is true a source of illusions.
Here next is the trajectory of one point (P) seen relatively from an observer (M). The two trajectories are perfect circles. The frequency of (M) is twice the (P) one.
From (observer (M) the trajectory of (P) is no more a circle but seems to be an ellipse. However, it has not the ellipse symmetry. More, the relative (P) trajectory is not symmetric between its two halfcycle.
The next figure is the construction according to basic reasons perfectly defined and not with hazardous imaninary. Also, it is not done according to the old Analytical Geometry. It represents a same
{M;P} system in two absolute circular orbit where the cycle of (M) is two time the (P) one. Their orbits are not concentric.
The relative (P) orbit observed from (M) is not a circle form while it represent the exact distance observed between this two points. It is what should be measured if an experimetal technique can perform it.
The system {M;P} may represent an equivalent of real planets for example the orbit of Mars seen measured from the Earth. These two are turning around a center near the Sun.
 Kepler Mars orbit non opposition (optonline.net)
 diagram of pregnant woman (Alaska Airlines/Horizon Air, Alaska, USA)
 sun orbit of Lebanon (Australia)
 HoChiMinh city wind diagram (fpt.vn, Vietnam)
 pregnant woman body diagram inside (optonline.net, USA)
 golden communications group Ho Chi Minh game show producer (Malaysia, www.hkchcc.org/girlsasiagame.jp)
This next figure is a diagram for orbital type of Pluto around the earth. This shows that all the Solar planets have an relative orbit around the Earth not as an ellipse.
Here is the type of Sun orbit relatively to a given point on the Earth during an entire day if the Sun center is considered as fixed. In this case, the Sun orbit is exactly an oval form. During a entire year this orbit will not be a continous but a not closed form. Its curve will be as a point on a running wheel but this latter should have an oval form.
It can not be concluded that at midday the Sun is nearest than during the night because of the Sun distance. This difference is negligible because the Earth diameter is too small relative to the faraway Sun.
From this real trajectory according to the real distance between the earth from the Sun, we can note that the time of HotSun is shorter than the one of cooling Night during the Earth's 24h. Then, the hothouse effect is quite invalidated. This socalled effect is more pronounced when we consider this trajectory of real distance during a whole year duration.
Consequently, on Earth it is the globe law as ring structure that furnish a perpetual energy activity. There is not the Earth hot chore of magma that is created by the Newton Gravitational law. A globe structure is only deduced from the matter condensation process that in turn, rests on the Absolute space potential/restpoint principle.
Note
All these relative may seem too strange to you because until now they are not mentionned in Astronomy.
However, these orbits are the everyday truth and practised by everybody. For example any team playing ball are practising and mastering such complicate relative trajectory. So when one run after a ball, the one main thing is to look after this ball without worrying about its trajectory form. While really, the whole ball trajectory is the most complocated one. In fact the heavenly body relative trajectories are the most simple as shown above.
Note
All these spatial constructions of relative trajectories are reversible. This is to say that if a relative trajectory is précisely measured then, the absolute initial orbit of a heavenly body around its restcenter can be deduced from there.
For example, if the relative orbit of Mars or Venus are measured then their absolute orbit around the Sun can be defined. It is the possibility for any star if their distance from the Earth can be well defined. Therefore, science can proved that the Earth is not the Universe center. Until now all the heavenly bodies orbit are defined theorically using the hupothetic Newton's Universal Gravity as foundation. It is a false method to search object location by the masses.
From this result, we can see that there are always stange behavior in the different planet orbit, if astronomists are supposing that all the planets of the Solar sytem are theoricaly a circle or nearly an ellipse. From there they use the Relativity theory to justifyed any of this strange orbital behavior.
This should be applied to any satellite around the Earth. The deformations are more pronounced if the absolute orbit of the satellite is an ellipse one. The distorsion is more imprdicable when the ratio of their rotation frequency takes any value.
This trajectory of relative motion between two points is precisely contructed according to space structure. It shows that the Coriolis Force equation is a false one.
How the Dakhiometry can define rationally a parabola
 projectile goes 16.5m at 15 degrees above the horizon how fast was it going (USA)
Any parabola trajectory parameter can be determined easily by spatial construction.
For such conditions, if friction in this trajectory is negligible and the impact point is on the horizontal plan of the launching one then, we have:
Horzontal speed = 17.6043 m/s;
Initial energy = 310.1313 J/kg
Horizontal efficient energy = 309.9117 J per 1kg
with a lost of the initial lauching energy of about 1/1000
Total trajectory time = 0.9372 s
Height of trajectory = 1.0772 m
All these values define the parabola inscribed in this two given data. Also from given initial energy and angle of trajectory it can be determined precisely and simply all the other such trajectory characteristics.
 algorithms and analytic geometry (Brazil)
These old mathematics methods are approximations of empirism human manner to get an approach to realities. The reason of this man working behavior is because he never had some knowledge on the universe matter characteristics. The Nothingness had produce ignorance of the Space Physic even though this latter is the basic concrete matter of knowledge for science. All what are denoted in Mathematics as the Conics are really a poor science sigth on the wealthy space. The Newton's laws that gives rise to the modern sciences is an example of a deep ignorance on the matter prpoerties. If man wish for going further into extraterrestrial space he has to change all his manner to get a more rationnal approch to true Astronomy else than with the erroneous and monotonous socalled Universal Gravitation by Masses.
 a + scientific + that + do + work + "whith" + law + of + motion (conroeisd.net, Conroe Independent School District, Texas, USA)
 diagram of the overall universal law (direcway.com, USA)
 Representation of addition and subtraction movement (United Arab Emirates)
 Naruto five "mation" (verizon.net, Washington dc, USA)
 types of basic motion graph (Malaysia, http://content.tutorvista.com/)
 basic rigid motions of the plane (monmouth.edu, Monmouth University, New Jersey, USA)
The following figure shows the five basic FORMS seen as movements.
Figure resumes the Five Basic space stucture for universal laws of movement.
Voilà comment, en se débarrassant de la Relativité comme une propriété de l'univers,
Il Faut décrire l'Espace de l'univers, audelà de toute notion de figé de l'espace et de préjugé relativiste du Mouvement, car l'espace est à la fois Lieux et Mouvement. Il n'y a pas de mouvement en soi, tout comme il n'y a pas de Temps, pour courir derrière son ombre.
 geomatrical animation compass (Sri Lanka)
 line circle journeys (btcentralplus.com, UK)
 Changing + Universe + Concepts (pacbell.net, USA)
Do you know why it is difficult to build a steady aeroplane as an unique wing system?
It is because its straight line trajectory is not generated by two fixed independnat points as stated above in the first case of motion generation. An classical aeroplane with a long tail can realize two independent points in space. While an unique solid wing whatever its forms, is only one point. Because a solid system has only one center.
 according + to + physics + + 2 + stone + one + 5 + kg + and + other + 10 + kg + if + we + leave + these + from + hight + which + one + is + come + down + first (United Arab Emirates)
According to natural law defined in Dakhiometry, if friction is neglected,
1)  The two masses is the first down because there is no last arrived.
2)  The two masses is the last down because there is no first arrived.
In conclusion
Potential between Location in space ignore the mass quantity hierarchy. Absolute space means that a same Potential corresponds to a defined distance and inversely, whatever is the distance direction.
One uses to tell: what a paradoxical law. Because one uses to think the conventional Force, as the mass time the acceleration of an object...
Maintenant, quoi d'autre?
Extirper les esprits des vielles croyances millénaires est un horrible boulot. Car, si l'homme a son esprit capable de penser par déduction de raison, tout ce que je dis dans mes textes, se complètent en étendus lumineux par euxmême.
Vous avez vu ici, que l'espace matière est à la fois Contenu et Contenant. Ne demandezvous jamais pourquoi il y a la Cinématique et à son côté, la Dynamique, tous deux séparés par une dichotomie newtonnienne? Non, dans léthargie, on ronfle mais on ne se demande rien d'autre que ce qui plaît ou ne plaise pas à son nombril. Ce qui prouve que le science Mécanique est un résultat direct de l'empirisme des esprits persévérant dans sa capacité de Tâtonner. D'ailleurs, la Cinématique et la Dynamisme sont acceptées comme telles que parce qu'elle fait la brillance de Grande Science, plus grand que ça, tu meurs.
Revenons aux raisons en considérant que l'Espace est Contenant et Contenu.
a)  Le Contenant est ce que je viens de définir cidessus, comme structures de localisations supports ayant son immuabilité comme propriété de l'espace.
b)  Maintenant, il est nécessaire de voir quel est son Contenu. Dans mes illustrations des 5 structures d'espace pour le mouvement, il y est noté la présence générale d'un traingle se référant à deux centres de références.
Alors, Le Contenu de l'espace concerne la Matière Condensée des constructions de l'univers. La Matière Condensée est régie par les lois de Potentiel d'espace. Ce qui veut dire que la Matière Condensée est NECESSAIREMENT descriptible par les énergies. L'Energie qui est espace, s'exprime aussi par les éléments d'espace.
Alors, il y a longtemps que j'ai exposé en mes textes de ce siteci, ce qu'est le théorème de:
La Structure Triangulaire Générale
Ce théorème que chacun de vous cite comme le théorème de Pythagore. Il n'y a pas de plus grand sacrilège de spoliation d'ignares! L'Ignorance ne pardonne pas mais aussi, elle ne se pardonne pas. Parce que vous croyez être cultivé et diplômé en Math...
Voilà MON THEOREME DE LA DAKHIOMETRIE,
celui qui permet d'entrer dans le monde de la Connaissance, en homme adulte, sevré de ses Dieux.
Ce théorème permet de voir l'espace dans son aspect Matière Condensée qui génère le phénomène MOUVEMENT.
J'ai donc explicité la généralité de la matière univers avec sa propriété double de ContenantContenu. La VRAIE science Dakhiométrique permet d'embrasser les phénomènes de Construction du TOUT univers.
Conclusion
Allezy avec vos formules et baguette magique appelées Théorème de (Pythagore, Thalès,... Newton, Einstein,...). Avec la vue Relativiste de vos Dieux, dites moi ce que vous voyez à votre l'horizon. Je crois que le fond d'un puit, ça s'appelle une impasse!
 mécanique rationnelle
Notez la différence immense, entre la Relativité et L'Absolu de l'espace.
La mécanique rationnelle est issue d'une contradiction que l'on ignore. Elle est issue de:
a)  La Cinématique est absolue, parce que les considérations mathématiques sont toujours Absolues.
b)  La Dynamique newtonnenne est une pure Relarivité. Avec les meilleures volonté, on ne peut vraiment pas le nier. Il suffit de regarder les définitions de la Force. On le sait très bien, sans jamais oser la regarder en face. La Référence Galiléenne le montre clairement comme référence relative. La mécanique rationnelle ne peut rien faire sans ses références. Les contorsions de la Relativité d'Einstein sont les symptomes de l'apogée de ces tourments de Référence Mécaniques. L'exemple de l'impasse Relativiste est illustrée par le théorème de d'Alembert avec la force virtuelle mais surtout celui de la Loi de Mondre Action de Maupertuis, qui ne dit rien de commode et de pratique pour la mécanique rationnelle. Cette confusion est illustré par la Principe Optique de Fermat qui ne sait pas qu'il lui faut une référence absolue et non la relativité d'une vitesse.
Aussi croire que la mécanique rationnelle est nonrelativiste est une ignorance que l'on ignore, parce que l'on a fait un cadre d'or pour la Cinématique, ce borgne du couple borgneaveugle.
 decimal + system + of + measurement + whose + units + are + based + on + certain + physical + standars + and + are + "sacaled" + on + multiples + of + 10 (megared.net.mx, Mexico)
 Draw a segment of 6.4 drawing (telecomitalia.it, Italy)
Here is how to draw any decimal length, provide that a unit length is defined.
With the usual Thales property it can be constructed any decimal length in the unit defined.
Then, any given decimal length can be constructed. Scale problem is resolved according to homothetic construction.
Note that not only decimal is concerned. There is general method of construction. Any length can be obtained as part of an unit length. It can be defined rationnaly et precisely by construction. There is no "hole" of constructions in the succession of a length. It is to state that there is no irrational quantity.
Note that the inverse
(2/1.36...) = 1.47
should be done according to this process on figure and not as what was done by Euclide using Number names.
Here also, the Dakhiometry has a general precise but simple method to do divisions of length quantities.
 logic + division + axiom (The University of Utah, USA)
Actually. It is the idea of how was stated the Euclide's Division Algorithm. We can see that this is mostly a congruent problem and there are few rational solutions.
 Destiny + "Cululate" (operamini.net)
Unluckily...
 the + sum + of + three + times + a + number + and + 7 + more + than + the + numver + is + the + same + as + the + difference + between + 11 + and + twice + the + number + what + is + the + number (comcast.net, Florida, USA)
A strange concept on FORM
 prove + a + circle + fits + in + any + triangle (Champion Technologies, Chimical Company, West Texas, USA)
It is a basic intersting problem. However, one should pose this problem in it inverse manner. That is to ask why a any triangle fits in a circle.
Because there is no independent form denoted as Triangles. Really there are only three basic forms. They are: Circle, Square and Polygone.
1)  A triangle is only a circle because 3 points always belong to a circle. As one tells it, a triangle is a Three Angles. Angles are property of circle Directions. What we know as properties in a triangle are the ones of the circle.
Note that if one knows that a triangle is in fact a circle then, it is very easy to resolve spatially the Morley's theorem.
2)  What polygon is inscribed in a circle? It does if all each set of 3 vertices are inscribed in a same circle.
We can see now that really there are only TWO BASIC forms: the circle and the square!
3)  But we can do more:
There is only ONE UNIQUE Basic Form: the Circle. It is because a square is no more then two rectangular triangles!
Finally
A circle is not really a form because it is only the remanence or the persistence of vision or the memory of the matter space before the beginning of the universe construction. A cirlce is only a BASIC LOGIC of space!
What is unusual but wealthy view point on space structure or space as Potential Energy.
